Mercury risk assessment combining internal and external exposure methods for a population living near a municipal solid waste incinerator

Risk assessments for human health have been conducted for municipal solid waste incinerators (MSWIs) in many western countries, whereas only a few risk assessments have been performed for MSWIs in developing countries such as China where the use of waste incineration is increasing rapidly. To assess...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEnvironmental pollution (1987) Vol. 219; pp. 1060 - 1068
Main Authors Deng, Chunyan, Xie, Han, Ye, Xuejie, Zhang, Haoran, Liu, Maodian, Tong, Yindong, Ou, Langbo, Yuan, Wen, Zhang, Wei, Wang, Xuejun
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Elsevier Ltd 01.12.2016
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Risk assessments for human health have been conducted for municipal solid waste incinerators (MSWIs) in many western countries, whereas only a few risk assessments have been performed for MSWIs in developing countries such as China where the use of waste incineration is increasing rapidly. To assess the mercury exposure risks of a population living near the largest MSWI in South China, we combined internal exposure and external exposure assessment with an individual–specific questionnaire. The mercury concentrations in air, soil, and locally collected food around the MSWI were assessed. The total mercury (T-Hg) and methylmercury (MeHg) of 447 blood samples from a control group, residential exposure group, and MSWI workers were measured. The internal and external exposures of the subject population were analyzed. Significant difference in MeHg concentrations was observed between the control group and the exposed group, between the control group and the MSWI workers, and between the exposed group and the MSWI workers (median levels: 0.70 μg/L, 0.81 μg/L, and 1.02 μg/L for the control group, exposed group, and MSWI workers, respectively). The MeHg/T-Hg ratio was 0.51 ± 0.19, 0.59 ± 0.17 and 0.58 ± 0.25, respectively. Multiple linear regression analysis indicated that MeHg concentrations were positively correlated with the gaseous mercury in the air. Combining internal and external exposure assessment showed that the direct contribution of MSWI emissions was minor compared with the dietary contribution. The external and internal exposures were well matched with each other. This study also suggested that an integrated method combining internal and external exposure assessment with an individual–specific questionnaire is feasible to assess the risks for a population living near a MSWI. [Display omitted] •Monitored external exposure and internal exposure.•Mercury risk assessment of both population living near and working within a MSWI.•An integrated method combining both external and internal exposure assessment. Risk assessment combining internal and external exposure showed that the impact of MSWI emissions (inhalation) on human mercury exposure was minimal compared with the food intake.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0269-7491
1873-6424
1873-6424
DOI:10.1016/j.envpol.2016.09.006