Can methods based on spot urine samples be used to estimate average population 24 h sodium excretion? Results from the Isfahan Salt Study

To assess agreement between established methods of estimating salt intake from spot urine collections and 24 h urinary Na (24hUNa) and then to develop a valid formula that can be used in the Iranian population to estimate salt intake from spot urine samples. A validation study. Three spot urine samp...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPublic health nutrition Vol. 23; no. 2; pp. 202 - 213
Main Authors Mohammadifard, Noushin, Marateb, Hamidreza, Mansourian, Marjan, Khosravi, Alireza, Abdollahi, Zahra, Campbell, Norman Rc, Webster, Jacqui, Petersen, Kristina, Sarrafzadegan, Nizal
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Cambridge University Press 01.02.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To assess agreement between established methods of estimating salt intake from spot urine collections and 24 h urinary Na (24hUNa) and then to develop a valid formula that can be used in the Iranian population to estimate salt intake from spot urine samples. A validation study. Three spot urine samples were collected (fasting second-void morning; afternoon; evening) on the same day as a 24 h urine collection. We estimated 24hUNa from spot specimens using the Kawasaki, Tanaka and INTERSALT equations. Two new formulas were developed, the Iran formula 1 (Iran 1) and Iran formula 2 (Iran 2), based on our population characteristics. Iranian adults recruited in 2014-2015. Healthy volunteer adults aged ≥18 years. With all three spot urine specimens, predicted population 24hUNa was underestimated based on the INTERSALT equation (-469 to -708 mg/d; all P < 0·05) and conversely overestimation occurred with the Kawasaki equation (926 to 1080 mg/d; all P < 0·01). The Tanaka equation produced comparable estimates to measured 24hUNa (-151 to 86 mg/d; all P > 0·49). The newly derived formulas, Iran 1 and Iran 2, showed less mean bias than the established equations (Iran 1: 43 to 80 mg/d, all P > 0·55; Iran 2: 22 to 90 mg/d, all P > 0·50). In this Iranian sample, the Tanaka equation and newly derived formulas produced group-level estimates comparable to measured 24hUNa. The newly developed formulas showed less mean bias than established equations; however, they need to be tested for generalization in a larger sample.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:1368-9800
1475-2727
DOI:10.1017/S136898001900257X