Assessment measures for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy among pediatric oncology patients: an updated systematic review

• Published in: Supportive care in cancer Vol. 33; no. 6; p. 514
• Main Authors: Mao, Ting, Yorke, Janelle, Shi, Yan, Shen, Nanping, Wang, Haixia, Wong, Frances-Kam-Yuet, Lam, Katherine Ka Wai, Tang, Lai Ngo, Liu, Qi, Abu-Odah, Hammoda, Belay, Getaneh Mulualem, Yang, Funa, Wang, Li, Cheng, Frankie Wai Tsoi, Zhang, Xiaoju, Ho, Ka Yan
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01.06.2025; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Adolescent; Antineoplastic Agents - administration & dosage; Antineoplastic Agents - adverse effects; Chemotherapy; Child; Clinical outcomes; Cross-sectional studies; Humans; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Neoplasms - drug therapy; Nursing; Nursing Research; Oncology; Pain management; Pain Medicine; Pediatrics; Peripheral Nervous System Diseases - chemically induced; Peripheral Nervous System Diseases - diagnosis; Peripheral neuropathy; Physicians; Rehabilitation Medicine; Review; Symptom management; Systematic review; Assessment measure; Pediatric oncology; Systematic review; Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy
• ISSN: 0941-4355; 1433-7339; 1433-7339
• DOI: 10.1007/s00520-025-09515-5

Objective To update the systematic review of assessment tools on chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) for pediatric oncology patients based on the evidence available after the published review in 2020. Data sources Seven English-language databases (PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus and Web of Science) were searched for studies published from Nov 9, 2018, to May 20, 2024. Study selection Studies that contained subjects who had a cancer diagnosis and were aged under 18 years and discussed the development of a tool to measure CIPN or assessed all test items and response categories for CIPN were included. Data extraction and synthesis Data were screened and extracted independently using predesigned tables. The quality of each study was assessed based on Joanna Briggs Institute’s critical appraisal tools for analytical cross-sectional studies and case control studies. The quality of identified instruments for CIPN was evaluated by the modified version of Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) tool. Results A total of 5 studies (with 633 patients) were included in the systematic review. Only one study was rated as high quality. We newly identified two patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), one objective assessment and a pain scale, and three new studies about the previous identified CIPN assessment measures. Conclusions and relevance Based on the current evidence, the pediatric-modified Total Neuropathy Score (ped-mTNS) and the Total Neuropathy Score-Pediatric Vincristine (TNS-PV) are still the two most appropriate tools for healthcare professionals to use in clinical settings. Our results also addressed the gap in existing literature by showing two newly PROMs for CIPN in pediatric oncology patients with acceptable quality. The combination of physician-based assessment tools and PROMs are recommended to evaluate the patients’ CIPN-related symptoms.