Comparison of the Metabolic Effects of Ritonavir-Boosted Darunavir or Atazanavir Versus Raltegravir, and the Impact of Ritonavir Plasma Exposure: ACTG 5257

Background. Metabolic effects following combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) vary by regimen type. Changes in metabolic effects were assessed following cART in the AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) A5257 study, and correlated with plasma ritonavir trough concentrations (C24). Methods. Treatment...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inClinical infectious diseases Vol. 60; no. 12; pp. 1842 - 1851
Main Authors Ofotokun, Ighovwerha, Na, Lumine H., Landovitz, Raphael J., Ribaudo, Heather J., McComsey, Grace A., Godfrey, Catherine, Aweeka, Francesca, Cohn, Susan E., Sagar, Manish, Kuritzkes, Daniel R., Brown, Todd T., Patterson, Kristine B., Para, Michael F., Leavitt, Randi Y., Villasis-Keever, Angelina, Baugh, Bryan P., Lennox, Jeffrey L., Currier, Judith S.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Oxford University Press 15.06.2015
SeriesEditor's choice
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background. Metabolic effects following combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) vary by regimen type. Changes in metabolic effects were assessed following cART in the AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) A5257 study, and correlated with plasma ritonavir trough concentrations (C24). Methods. Treatment-naive adult subjects were randomized to ritonavir-boosted atazanavir or darunavir, or raltegravir-based cART. Changes in lipids and other metabolic outcomes over time were estimated. Differences between arms were estimated with 97.5% confidence intervals and compared using pairwise Student t tests. Associations between ritonavir C24 and lipid changes at week 48 were evaluated via linear regression. Results. Analyses included 1797 subjects with baseline fasting data. Baseline lipid profiles and metabolic syndrome rates (approximately 21%) were similar across arms. Comparable increases occurred in total cholesterol, triglycerides, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol with the boosted protease inhibitors (PIs); each PI had greater increases relative to raltegravir (all P ≤ .001 at week 96). Metabolic syndrome incident rates by week 96 (approximately 22%) were not different across arms. Ritonavir C24 was not different by arm (P = .89) (median, 69 ng/mL and 74 ng/mL in the atazanavir and darunavir arms, respectively) and were not associated with changes in lipid measures (all P > .1). Conclusions. Raltegravir produced the most favorable lipid profile. Metabolic syndrome rates were high at baseline and increased to the same degree in all arms. Ritonavir C24 was not different in the PI arms and had no relationship with the modest but comparable increased in lipids observed with either atazanavir or darunavir. The long-term clinical significance of the lipid changes noted with the PIs relative to raltegravir deserves further evaluation. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT 00811954.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-News-3
content type line 23
Members of the ACTG A5257 Team are listed in the Appendix.
ISSN:1058-4838
1537-6591
DOI:10.1093/cid/civ193