The Enantiomeric Separation of Tetrahydrobenzimidazoles Cyclodextrins- and Cyclofructans

ABSTRACT High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and capillary electrophoresis (CE) were used to examine the enantiomeric separation of a series of 17 racemic tetrahydrobenzimidazole analytes. These compounds were prepared as part of a synthetic program directed towards a select group of pyrro...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inChirality (New York, N.Y.) Vol. 25; no. 2; pp. 133 - 140
Main Authors Perera, Sirantha, Na, Yun-Cheol, Doundoulakis, Thomas, Ngo, Victor J., Feng, Qing, Breitbach, Zachary S., Lovely, Carl J., Armstrong, Daniel W.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published HOBOKEN Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.02.2013
Wiley
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:ABSTRACT High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and capillary electrophoresis (CE) were used to examine the enantiomeric separation of a series of 17 racemic tetrahydrobenzimidazole analytes. These compounds were prepared as part of a synthetic program directed towards a select group of pyrrole‐imidazole alkaloids. This group of natural products has a unique framework of pyrrole‐ and guanidine‐containing fused rings which can be constructed through the intermediacy of a tetrahydrobenzimidazole scaffold. Several bonded cyclodextrin‐ (both native and derivatized) and derivatized cyclofructan‐based chiral stationary phases were evaluated for their ability to separate these racemates via HPLC. Similarly, several cyclodextrin derivatives and derivatized cyclofructan were evaluated for their ability to separate this set of chiral compounds via CE. Enantiomeric selectivity was observed for the entire set of racemic compounds using HPLC with resolution values up to 3.0. Among the 12 different CSPs, enantiomeric recognition was most frequently observed with the Cyclobond RN and LARIHC CF6‐P, while the Cyclobond DMP yielded the greatest number of baseline separations. Fifteen of the analytes showed enantiomeric recognition in CE with resolution values as high as 5.0 and hydroxypropyl‐γ‐cyclodextrin was the most effective chiral additive. Chirality 25:133–140, 2013. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Bibliography:istex:157788090139247421AC5A2826A22025E2E15F4B
ark:/67375/WNG-HJX37Q7T-Z
ArticleID:CHIR22127
NIH RePORTER
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0899-0042
1520-636X
DOI:10.1002/chir.22127