Sclerodermatous graft‐versus‐host disease: clinical spectrum and therapeutic challenges

Summary Sclerodermatous graft‐versus‐host disease (GVHD) is a rare complication of bone marrow transplantation. While GVHD is often associated with the beneficial graft vs. tumour effect, it also contributes towards significant morbidity and mortality. No reliably effective treatment has yet been es...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBritish journal of dermatology (1951) Vol. 156; no. 5; pp. 1032 - 1038
Main Authors White, J.M.L., Creamer, D., Du Vivier, A.W.P., Pagliuca, A., Ho, A.Y., Devereux, S., Salisbury, J.R., Mufti, G.J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.05.2007
Blackwell
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Summary Sclerodermatous graft‐versus‐host disease (GVHD) is a rare complication of bone marrow transplantation. While GVHD is often associated with the beneficial graft vs. tumour effect, it also contributes towards significant morbidity and mortality. No reliably effective treatment has yet been established. We present 10 patients with haematological malignancies who underwent an allogeneic stem cell transplant and developed sclerodermatous GVHD. Donor lymphocyte infusion administered for relapse or reducing donor T‐cell chimerism was a known trigger for sclerodermatous GVHD in four of the patients. Treatment with immunosuppressants, psoralen plus ultraviolet A (PUVA) and extracorporeal photopheresis has been largely unsuccessful in their management. Intensive immunosuppression including the use of anti‐CD20 monoclonal antibody may have contributed to relapse of leukaemia in one patient 10 years after her transplant. Sclerodermatous GVHD may occur without a preceding lichenoid stage. Clinical heterogeneity is common, although sclerodermatous GVHD has a predilection for the limbs. Treatment options are largely unsatisfactory if conventional immunosuppression fails. PUVA may give some symptomatic benefit and extracorporeal photopheresis seems to be less efficacious than previously published work suggests.
Bibliography:Conflicts of interest
None declared.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Case Study-2
ObjectType-Feature-4
ObjectType-Report-1
ObjectType-Article-3
ISSN:0007-0963
1365-2133
DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2133.2007.07827.x