Sclerodermatous graft‐versus‐host disease: clinical spectrum and therapeutic challenges
Summary Sclerodermatous graft‐versus‐host disease (GVHD) is a rare complication of bone marrow transplantation. While GVHD is often associated with the beneficial graft vs. tumour effect, it also contributes towards significant morbidity and mortality. No reliably effective treatment has yet been es...
Saved in:
Published in | British journal of dermatology (1951) Vol. 156; no. 5; pp. 1032 - 1038 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Oxford, UK
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.05.2007
Blackwell |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Summary Sclerodermatous graft‐versus‐host disease (GVHD) is a rare complication of bone marrow transplantation. While GVHD is often associated with the beneficial graft vs. tumour effect, it also contributes towards significant morbidity and mortality. No reliably effective treatment has yet been established. We present 10 patients with haematological malignancies who underwent an allogeneic stem cell transplant and developed sclerodermatous GVHD. Donor lymphocyte infusion administered for relapse or reducing donor T‐cell chimerism was a known trigger for sclerodermatous GVHD in four of the patients. Treatment with immunosuppressants, psoralen plus ultraviolet A (PUVA) and extracorporeal photopheresis has been largely unsuccessful in their management. Intensive immunosuppression including the use of anti‐CD20 monoclonal antibody may have contributed to relapse of leukaemia in one patient 10 years after her transplant. Sclerodermatous GVHD may occur without a preceding lichenoid stage. Clinical heterogeneity is common, although sclerodermatous GVHD has a predilection for the limbs. Treatment options are largely unsatisfactory if conventional immunosuppression fails. PUVA may give some symptomatic benefit and extracorporeal photopheresis seems to be less efficacious than previously published work suggests. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | Conflicts of interest
None declared. ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Case Study-2 ObjectType-Feature-4 ObjectType-Report-1 ObjectType-Article-3 |
ISSN: | 0007-0963 1365-2133 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2007.07827.x |