Subtotal stomach-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (SSPPD) prevents postoperative delayed gastric emptying

Background and Objectives Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) is one of main complications after pylorus‐preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD) with regional lymph node dissection (RLND). The aim of this study was to retrospectively investigate whether subtotal stomach‐preserving PD (SSPPD) decreased...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of surgical oncology Vol. 102; no. 6; pp. 615 - 619
Main Authors Kurahara, Hiroshi, Takao, Sonshin, Shinchi, Hiroyuki, Mataki, Yuko, Maemura, Kousei, Sakoda, Masahiko, Ueno, Shinichi, Natsugoe, Shoji
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 01.11.2010
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background and Objectives Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) is one of main complications after pylorus‐preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD) with regional lymph node dissection (RLND). The aim of this study was to retrospectively investigate whether subtotal stomach‐preserving PD (SSPPD) decreased incidence of DGE. Methods This study included 112 consecutive patients underwent PPPD (n = 48) or SSPPD (n = 64) with/without RLND. DGE was classified into three categories (grades A, B, and C) according to the guideline proposed by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery. Results The incidence of DGE grade B/C in SSPPD with RLND (13.0%) was lower compared with that (34.8%) in PPPD with RLND (P = 0.0326). Consequently, the mean length of postoperative hospital stay of SSPPD with RLND group was significantly shorter than that of PPPD with RLND (P = 0.0476). Conclusions SSPPD could be substituted for PPPD due to decreased postoperative DGE when RLND is involved. A randomized control trial of SSPPD versus PPPD should be considered. J. Surg. Oncol. 2010;102:615–619. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Bibliography:ArticleID:JSO21687
ark:/67375/WNG-T73D8PFZ-H
istex:2FA81745E3A6BD74D832198EBDBA0DE3FF02938B
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0022-4790
1096-9098
DOI:10.1002/jso.21687