Dabigatran Concentration: Variability and Potential Bleeding Prediction In “Real–Life” Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

Routine laboratory monitoring is currently not recommended in patients receiving dabigatran despite its considerable variation in plasma concentration. However, in certain clinical situations, measurements of the dabigatran effect may be desirable. We aimed to assess the variability of dabigatran tr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBasic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology Vol. 117; no. 5; pp. 323 - 329
Main Authors Šinigoj, Petra, Malmström, Rickard E., Vene, Nina, Rönquist‐Nii, Yuko, Božič‐Mijovski, Mojca, Pohanka, Anton, Antovic, Jovan P., Mavri, Alenka
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01.11.2015
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Routine laboratory monitoring is currently not recommended in patients receiving dabigatran despite its considerable variation in plasma concentration. However, in certain clinical situations, measurements of the dabigatran effect may be desirable. We aimed to assess the variability of dabigatran trough and peak concentration and explore the potential relationship between dabigatran concentration and adverse events. We included 44 patients with atrial fibrillation who started treatment with dabigatran 150 mg (D150) or 110 mg (D110) twice daily. They contributed 170 trough and peak blood samples that were collected 2–4 and 6–8 weeks after dabigatran initiation. Plasma dabigatran concentration was measured by LC‐MS/MS and indirectly, by selected coagulation tests. D110 patients were older (74 ± 7 versus 68 ± 6 years), had lower creatinine clearance (68 ± 21 versus 92 ± 24 mL/min) and higher CHA2DS2‐VASc score (3.1 ± 1.3 versus 2.3 ± 0.9) compared to D150 patients (all p < 0.05), but both had similar dabigatran concentrations in both trough and peak samples. Dabigatran concentrations varied less in trough than in peak samples (17.0 ± 13.6 versus 26.6 ± 19.2%, p = 0.02). During the 12‐month follow‐up, 4 patients on D150 and 6 on D110 suffered minor bleeding. There was no major bleeding or thromboembolic event. Patients with bleeding had significantly higher average trough dabigatran concentrations (93 ± 36 versus 72 ± 62 μg/L, p = 0.02) than patients without bleeding, while peak dabigatran values had no predictive value. Dabigatran dose selection according to the guidelines resulted in appropriate trough concentrations with acceptable repeatability. High trough concentrations may predispose patients to the risk of minor bleeding.
ISSN:1742-7835
1742-7843
1742-7843
DOI:10.1111/bcpt.12417