Unilateral vs bilateral sacral neuromodulation in pigs with formalin‐induced detrusor hyperactivity

• Published in: BJU international Vol. 103; no. 2; pp. 260 - 263
• Main Authors: Kaufmann, Sascha, Naumann, Carsten M., Hamann, Morritz F., Seif, Christoph, Braun, Peter M., Jünemann, Klaus P., Van Der Horst, Christof
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.01.2009; Wiley-Blackwell
• Subjects: Administration, Intravesical; Animals; Biological and medical sciences; detrusor hyperactivity; Electric Stimulation - methods; Formaldehyde; Medical sciences; Muscle Contraction - physiology; Nephrology. Urinary tract diseases; neuromodulation; Spinal Nerve Roots - physiology; stimulation technique; Swine; Swine, Miniature; Urinary Bladder - innervation; Urinary Bladder - physiology; Urinary Bladder, Overactive - chemically induced; Urinary Bladder, Overactive - therapy; Nephrology; stimulation technique; Hyperactivity; Bilateral; Stimulation; detrusor hyperactivity; Neuromodulation; Urology; Pig; Vertebrata; Mammalia; Animal; Detrusor muscle; Unilateral; Artiodactyla; Technique; Ungulata; Comparative study; Sacral nerve
• ISSN: 1464-4096; 1464-410X
• DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07936.x

OBJECTIVE To investigate the efficacy of unilateral vs bilateral sacral neuromodulation (SNM) under standard experimental conditions by stimulating the dorsal sacral roots in pigs with formalin‐induced detrusor hyperactivity. MATERIALS AND METHODS After lumbosacral laminectomy in eight α‐chloralose‐anaesthetized Göttinger mini‐pigs, the dorsal roots of the nerve S3 were inserted into separate compartments of a size‐modified Brindley electrode. Detrusor hyperactivity was induced by intravesical instillation of a 0.25% formalin solution. Stimulation of the separated dorsal roots was performed on the unilateral right, respectively, the unilateral left side, as well as bilaterally and with stimulation off‐phases in a randomized pattern. A biphasic rectangular signal (impulse 200 µs, 20 Hz, 2.0 V) was used for SNM. The bladder pressure values were registered on a urodynamic unit and evaluated as contractions and amplitudes per minute. RESULTS During unilateral stimulation, the mean (sem) number of contractions was reduced significantly from 4.73 (0.66) to 2.73 (0.62). The amplitude was also reduced significantly from 12.86 (1.23) to 8.32 (0.66). By contrast, bilateral stimulation lowered the mean (sem) number of overactive detrusor contractions to 1.08 (1.02) and the amplitude to 3.08 (2.42), which are highly significant reductions. CONCLUSION In this porcine model, bilateral neurostimulation was a more effective method of SNM than unilateral stimulation. We assume that this is due to the additive effect of stimulating both sides, as well as the greater chance of stimulating the relevant dorsal roots of the sacral nerve fibres. By contrast, unilateral neuromodulation may be only partially effective by not being capable of influencing the entire bladder, or possibly by allowing new formation of neuronal pathophysiological pathways.