Predictors of functional outcomes following limb salvage surgery for lower-extremity soft tissue sarcoma

Background and Objectives Patient function has been conceptualized by clinical measures such as joint motion, muscle strength, disability, and general health status. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate tumor and treatment variables predictive of these conceptually different posttreatmen...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of surgical oncology Vol. 73; no. 4; pp. 206 - 211
Main Authors Davis, A.M., Sennik, S., Griffin, A.M., Wunder, J.S., O'Sullivan, B., Catton, C.N., Bell, R.S.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.04.2000
Wiley-Liss
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background and Objectives Patient function has been conceptualized by clinical measures such as joint motion, muscle strength, disability, and general health status. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate tumor and treatment variables predictive of these conceptually different posttreatment functional outcomes in patients treated with limb preservation surgery for lower‐extremity soft tissue sarcoma. Methods One hundred seventy‐two patients with minimum 1‐year follow‐up were evaluated using the following outcomes: impairment, measured by the 1987 and 1993 versions of the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Rating Scale (MSTS); disability, measured by the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS); and general health status, using the Short Form‐36 (SF‐36). Tumor and treatment‐related variables (age, gender, presenting disease status, anatomic site, tumor size, grade, depth, prior excision, irradiation, bone resection, motor nerve sacrifice, and complications) were extracted from the STS database. Results Large tumor size, bone resection, motor nerve resection, and complications were predictive of lower MSTS 1987 and 1993 scores. Patients with large, high‐grade tumors who required motor nerve resection were more disabled, as reflected by lower TESS scores. Only age and prior surgery were adverse predictors of SF‐36 score. Conclusions These results demonstrate that different factors are predictive of different patient outcomes, specifically, impairment, disability, and general health status. It is important to define function when counseling patients regarding their potential recovery based on tumor and treatment‐related variables. J. Surg. Oncol. 2000;73:206–211. © 2000 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Bibliography:istex:6BCB0BA22EB9E5400493DE435C002F468E75FCBC
ark:/67375/WNG-NW5QWSVP-8
ArticleID:JSO4
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0022-4790
1096-9098
DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1096-9098(200004)73:4<206::AID-JSO4>3.0.CO;2-5