Durvalumab With or Without Tremelimumab in Combination With Chemotherapy as First-Line Therapy for Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: The Phase III POSEIDON Study

The open-label, phase III POSEIDON study evaluated tremelimumab plus durvalumab and chemotherapy (T + D + CT) and durvalumab plus chemotherapy (D + CT) versus chemotherapy alone (CT) in first-line metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (mNSCLC). Patients (n = 1,013) with / wild-type mNSCLC were rando...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of clinical oncology Vol. 41; no. 6; pp. 1213 - 1227
Main Authors Johnson, Melissa L, Cho, Byoung Chul, Luft, Alexander, Alatorre-Alexander, Jorge, Geater, Sarayut Lucien, Laktionov, Konstantin, Kim, Sang-We, Ursol, Grygorii, Hussein, Maen, Lim, Farah Louise, Yang, Cheng-Ta, Araujo, Luiz Henrique, Saito, Haruhiro, Reinmuth, Niels, Shi, Xiaojin, Poole, Lynne, Peters, Solange, Garon, Edward B, Mok, Tony
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Wolters Kluwer Health 20.02.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The open-label, phase III POSEIDON study evaluated tremelimumab plus durvalumab and chemotherapy (T + D + CT) and durvalumab plus chemotherapy (D + CT) versus chemotherapy alone (CT) in first-line metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (mNSCLC). Patients (n = 1,013) with / wild-type mNSCLC were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to tremelimumab 75 mg plus durvalumab 1,500 mg and platinum-based chemotherapy for up to four 21-day cycles, followed by durvalumab once every 4 weeks until progression and one additional tremelimumab dose; durvalumab plus chemotherapy for up to four 21-day cycles, followed by durvalumab once every 4 weeks until progression; or chemotherapy for up to six 21-day cycles (with or without maintenance pemetrexed; all arms). Primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for D + CT versus CT. Key alpha-controlled secondary end points were PFS and OS for T + D + CT versus CT. PFS was significantly improved with D + CT versus CT (hazard ratio [HR], 0.74; 95% CI, 0.62 to 0.89; = .0009; median, 5.5 4.8 months); a trend for improved OS did not reach statistical significance (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.02; = .0758; median, 13.3 11.7 months; 24-month OS, 29.6% 22.1%). PFS (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.60 to 0.86; = .0003; median, 6.2 4.8 months) and OS (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.65 to 0.92; = .0030; median, 14.0 11.7 months; 24-month OS, 32.9% 22.1%) were significantly improved with T + D + CT versus CT. Treatment-related adverse events were maximum grade 3/4 in 51.8%, 44.6%, and 44.4% of patients receiving T + D + CT, D + CT, and CT, respectively; 15.5%, 14.1%, and 9.9%, respectively, discontinued treatment because of treatment-related adverse events. D + CT significantly improved PFS versus CT. A limited course of tremelimumab added to durvalumab and chemotherapy significantly improved OS and PFS versus CT, without meaningful additional tolerability burden, representing a potential new option in first-line mNSCLC.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:0732-183X
1527-7755
DOI:10.1200/JCO.22.00975