Real world effectiveness and safety of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian, fallopian, or primary peritoneal cancer: a Korean multicenter retrospective cohort study

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the combination of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin with carboplatin (CD) compared with those of carboplatin and paclitaxel (CP) for platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian, fallopian, or primary peritoneal cancer in a real-world setting in Korea. We enrolled...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of gynecologic oncology Vol. 31; no. 2; pp. e15 - 13
Main Authors Park, Soo Jin, Kim, Jihye, Kim, Hee Seung, Lee, Jeong-Won, Chang, Ha Kyun, Lee, Keun Ho, Kim, Dae-Yeon, Kim, Sunghoon, Chang, Suk-Joon, Han, Seung Su, Park, Sang-Yoon, Shim, Seung-Hyuk
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Korea (South) Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology; Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology 01.03.2020
대한부인종양학회
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2005-0380
2005-0399
2005-0399
DOI10.3802/jgo.2020.31.e15

Cover

More Information
Summary:To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the combination of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin with carboplatin (CD) compared with those of carboplatin and paclitaxel (CP) for platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian, fallopian, or primary peritoneal cancer in a real-world setting in Korea. We enrolled relevant patients from 9 institutions. All patients received CD or CP as the second- or third-line chemotherapy in routine clinical practice during 2013-2018. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and toxicity. The secondary endpoint included the objective response rate (ORR). Overall, 432 patients (224 and 208 in the CD and CP groups, respectively) were included. With a median follow-up of 18.9 months, the median PFS was not different between the groups (12.7 vs. 13.6 months; hazard ratio, 1.161; 95% confidence interval, 0.923-1.460; p=0.202). The ORR was 74.6% and 80.1% in the CD and CP group, respectively (p=0.556). Age and surgery at relapse were independent prognostic factors. More patients in the CD group significantly experienced a grade 3 to 4 hematologic toxicity and hand-foot syndrome (13.8% vs. 6.3%), whereas grade 2 or more alopecia (6.2% vs. 36.1%), peripheral neuropathy (4.4% vs. 11.4%), and allergic/hypersensitivity reaction (0.4% vs. 8.5%) developed more often in the CP group. The safety and effectiveness of chemotherapy with CD in a real-world setting were consistent with the results from a randomized controlled study. The different toxicity profiles between the 2 chemotherapy (CD and CP) regimens should be considered in the clinical practice. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03562533.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Soo Jin Park and Jihye Kim contributed equally to this work.
https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2020.31.e15
ISSN:2005-0380
2005-0399
2005-0399
DOI:10.3802/jgo.2020.31.e15