Measuring cognitive performance in way that incorporates the concept of active and healthy ageing (AHA)

•The European Innovation Partnership on Active and Healthy Ageing (EIP-AHA) is structured into six action groups.•Action group A3 comprises prevention, early diagnosis and management of physical and cognitive frailty and functional decline.•ICF-based biofunctional status (BFS)/biofunctional age (BFA...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMaturitas Vol. 125; pp. 27 - 32
Main Authors Stute, Petra, von Bergen, Mélanie, Bitterlich, Norman, Meissner, Florian, von Wolff, Michael, Poethig, Dagmar
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Ireland Elsevier B.V 01.07.2019
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•The European Innovation Partnership on Active and Healthy Ageing (EIP-AHA) is structured into six action groups.•Action group A3 comprises prevention, early diagnosis and management of physical and cognitive frailty and functional decline.•ICF-based biofunctional status (BFS)/biofunctional age (BFA) assessment tool with physical, mental-cognitive, emotional, social domains.•Ratings in the mental-cognitive domain of the assessment tool correlated with scores on a validated cognitive questionnaire.•The assessment tool, including its cognitive-mental function subdomain, meets the needs of the European Innovation Partnership on Active and Healthy Ageing (EIP-AHA). To demonstrate that the mental-cognitive domain of the validated generic bio-functional status (BFS)/bio-functional age (BFA) assessment tool reflects cognitive performance, and so meets the needs of the European Innovation Partnership on Active and Healthy Ageing (EIP-AHA). Monocenter, cross-sectional, observational, non-interventional trial (Bern Cohort Study 2014, BeCS-14) (Cantonal Ethics Committee, KEK-BE 023112). Main outcome measures: Ratings on the mental-cognitive BFS domain and on a validated cognitive performance test battery (Inventar der Gedächtnisdiagnostik; IGD) in 47 healthy, educated, middle-class, midlife men and women. Mean cognitive performance was average in younger, and higher in better-educated individuals. Participants’ BFA was 8.9 ± 6.6 year-equivalents below their chronological age. Subjects who performed better in the IGD (sub)domains also performed better in the BFS cognitive-mental function subdomain. Correlation analysis of the ratings in the BFS cognitive-mental function subdomain and total score on the IGD revealed that the highest correlations were achieved by the BFS parameters cognitive switching capability (r=−0.56, p < 0.001), strategic thinking (r=−0.49, p < 0.001), changeover capability (r=−0.50, p < 0.001) and stepping-stone-maze test (r=−0.51, p < 0.001). Ratings on the BFS cognitive-mental function subdomain correlated well with scores on a validated questionnaire for cognition assessment, the IGD. Therefore, the BFS/BFA assessment tool meets the needs of the EIP-AHA.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:0378-5122
1873-4111
1873-4111
DOI:10.1016/j.maturitas.2019.03.018