Impact of channel width on back biasing effect in tri-gate MOSFET

[Display omitted] •The electrical properties showed back bias effect in narrow device and wide device.•Back biasing effect is suppressed in narrow device with strong front gate control.•Lower mobility in narrow device is due to the poorer quality of front interface.•Back biasing effect was modeled w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMicroelectronic engineering Vol. 114; pp. 91 - 97
Main Authors Park, So Jeong, Jeon, Dae-Young, Montès, Laurent, Barraud, Sylvain, Kim, Gyu-Tae, Ghibaudo, Gérard
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Amsterdam Elsevier B.V 01.02.2014
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:[Display omitted] •The electrical properties showed back bias effect in narrow device and wide device.•Back biasing effect is suppressed in narrow device with strong front gate control.•Lower mobility in narrow device is due to the poorer quality of front interface.•Back biasing effect was modeled with 2-D numerical simulation.•The potential profile showed weak impact of back biasing in narrow device. The impact of channel width on back biasing effect in n-type tri-gate metal-oxide semiconductor field effect transistor (MOSFET) on silicon-on-insulator (SOI) material was investigated. In narrow device (Wtop_eff=20nm), the relatively high control of front gate on overall channel leads to the reduced electrostatic coupling between back and front channels as well as the suppression of back bias effects on both channel threshold voltage and the effective mobility, compared to the planar device (Wtop_eff=170nm). The lower effective mobility with back bias in narrow device was attributed to poorer front channel interface, and, to significant effect of sidewall mobility. The back biasing effect in tri-gate MOSFET was successfully modeled with 2-D numerical simulation. Through the simulation, the mobility results were interpreted as the consequence of two kinds of mobility degradations, i.e. different mobility attenuation along lateral and vertical directions of channel and additional mobility degradation in narrow device due to the effect of sidewall mobility. The potential profile extracted from numerical simulation provides strong evidence showing different degree of electrostatic coupling in narrow device and planar device due to a relative influence of front gate bias control over channels.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0167-9317
1873-5568
DOI:10.1016/j.mee.2013.09.016