Standardization of method for the analysis of dextromethorphan in urine

• Published in: Forensic science international Vol. 161; no. 2; pp. 198 - 201
• Main Authors: Kim, Eun-Mi, Lee, Ju-Seon, Park, Mee-Jung, Choi, Sang-Kil, Lim, Mi-Ae, Chung, Hee-Sun
• Format: Journal Article Conference Proceeding
• Language: English
• Published: Kidlington Elsevier Ireland Ltd 12.09.2006; Elsevier; Elsevier Limited
• Subjects: Accuracy; Adult; Antitussive Agents - urine; Biological and medical sciences; Calibration; Dextromethorphan; Dextromethorphan - urine; Dextrorphan - urine; Drug dosages; Ethanol; Female; Forensic medicine; Forensic Medicine - methods; Forensic sciences; Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry; General aspects; Humans; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects); Male; Medical sciences; Method validation; Middle Aged; Molecular Structure; Public health. Hygiene; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine; SOP; Standardization; Studies; Substance Abuse Detection - methods; Substance Abuse Detection - standards; Urinalysis; Korea; Dextromethorphan; Urinalysis; Method validation; SOP; Morphinan derivatives; Urine; Methodology; Forensic science; Legal medicine; Standardization; Opiates; Antitussive agent; Forensic aspect; Test validation; Analysis method; Technique
• ISSN: 0379-0738; 1872-6283
• DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2005.12.034

Dextromethorphan (DMP), an antitussive, is one of the most popular drugs among the younger generation in Korea. It usually is taken for its hallucinogenic properties and overdoses have been responsible for the fatalities that have been reported frequently. To control the abuse of DMP, the authorities restricted its use through classifying it as a controlled drug on October 2003. The purpose of this study is to provide a standard method for the analysis of DMP and its main metabolite, dextrorphan (DTP) in biological specimens. At first we established a standard operating procedure (SOP) for DMP/DTP in urine, and a method validation was performed. We also quantified DMP from 16 drug abuser's urine samples all of which were positive in the screening test for DMP. For the detection of DMP/DTP, urine samples were adjusted with 6N NaOH (pH 11) and extracted with ethylacetate. Thin layer chromatography was used as the screening test, and the final identification for DMP/DTP was used by GC/MS. The ions ( m/ z 271 for DMP, m/ z 257 for DTP and m/ z 86 for lidocaine as internal standard) were extracted from the full scan mass spectrum and were used for quantification. The selectivity, linearity of calibration, accuracy, within- and between day precision, limit of detection and quantification, recovery and stability were examined as parts of the method validation. Extracted calibration curves were linear from 100 to 2000 ng/mL for DMP and DTP with correlation coefficients better than 0.999. Limit detection was 50 ng/mL for DMP and DTP. Within-run precision (%CV) for DMP and DTP at three different concentrations (100, 500 and 1000 ng/mL) was 6.10–18.85%, and between-run precision was 1.70–7.86% for DMP and DTP. Absolute recovery for DMP and DTP was 57–74%, and relative recovery (extraction efficiency) was 80–89%. For 16 drug abuser's urine samples, the concentrations of DMP and DTP were 0.16–52.63 and 0.41–23.75 μg/mL, respectively. Method validation is an important requirement in the practice of chemical analysis, and it will be particularly useful in verifying the reliability of analytical results in the field of forensic science.