Accuracy of wristwatch-type photoplethysmography in detecting atrial fibrillation in daily life

• Published in: European Heart Journal - Digital Health Vol. 3; no. 3; pp. 455 - 464
• Main Authors: Nonoguchi, Noriko Matsushita, Soejima, Kyoko, Goda, Ayumi, Nishimura, Kunihiro, Onozuka, Daisuke, Fujita, Shin, Koyama, Fumio, Takano, Yuichi, Iguchi, Shiho, Sato, Hideki, Mohri, Takato, Katusme, Yumi, Tashiro, Mika, Hoshida, Kyoko, Miwa, Yosuke, Togashi, Ikuko, Ueda, Akiko, Sato, Toshiaki, Kohno, Takashi
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Oxford University Press (OUP) 01.09.2022
• Subjects: Original Article; Photoplethysmography; Wristwatch; Atrial fibrillation; Smartwatch; Mobile health technology
• ISSN: 2634-3916; 2634-3916
• DOI: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztac041

Detection of asymptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation is challenging. Smartphone- or smartwatch-based photoplethysmography is efficient at detecting irregular rhythms using pulse waves but is too complex for older patients. We aimed to evaluate the detection accuracy of atrial fibrillation by a wristwatch-type continuous pulse wave monitor (PWM) in daily life. Patients at high risk of atrial fibrillation but with no history of atrial fibrillation (  = 163; mean CHADS score, 1.9) and patients with known atrial fibrillation (  = 123, including 34 with persistent atrial fibrillation) underwent PWM and telemetry electrocardiogram recording for 3 days. Risk of atrial fibrillation was judged using the 'Kyorin Atrial Fibrillation Risk Score', a scoring system based on previously reported atrial fibrillation risk scoring systems. The PWM assessed the presence of atrial fibrillation at 30 min intervals, and the results were compared with the telemetry electrocardiogram findings. The PWMs accurately diagnosed two patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in the high-risk group. The PWMs accurately diagnosed 48 of the 55 patients with atrial fibrillation in the known-atrial fibrillation group. The PWM accuracy in detecting patients with atrial fibrillation was as follows: sensitivity, 98.0%; specificity, 90.6%; positive predictive value, 69.4%; negative predictive value, 99.5%. The respective values for intervals with atrial fibrillation were 86.9%, 98.8%, 89.6%, and 98.5%. The wristwatch-type PWM has shown feasibility in detecting atrial fibrillation in daily life and showed the possibility of being used as a screening tool.