Global nitrous oxide emission factors from agricultural soils after addition of organic amendments: A meta-analysis

•The meta-analysis included 38 studies (422N2O emission factors in 12 countries).•The weighted-REML showed higher synthetic-N emission factors with better N2O coverage.•We propose a global emission factor for organic inputs of 0.57±0.3% of N applied.•We encourage the use of three identified N2O risk...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAgriculture, ecosystems & environment Vol. 236; pp. 88 - 98
Main Authors Charles, Anaïs, Rochette, Philippe, Whalen, Joann K., Angers, Denis A., Chantigny, Martin H., Bertrand, Normand
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Amsterdam Elsevier B.V 02.01.2017
Elsevier BV
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•The meta-analysis included 38 studies (422N2O emission factors in 12 countries).•The weighted-REML showed higher synthetic-N emission factors with better N2O coverage.•We propose a global emission factor for organic inputs of 0.57±0.3% of N applied.•We encourage the use of three identified N2O risk classes of organic amendments.•Emission factors were 2.8 times greater in fine- than in coarse-textured soils. Agricultural soils receiving synthetic fertilizers and organic amendments containing nitrogen contribute a large part to anthropogenic nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions. As a source of nitrate that undergoes reduction to N2O, organic amendments also change soil C availability and redox potential, which influences the N2O emission factor (EF) of organically-amended soils. The objective of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis of N2O EF from agricultural soils receiving organic amendments. A global survey of peer-reviewed literature resulted in the selection of 38 studies including 422 observations at 43 sites in 12 countries. The analysis yielded a global EF for all organic sources, EForg, equal to 0.57±0.30%, which is lower than the IPCC default EF of 1 for synthetic fertilizers. Three groups of organic amendments with similar EFs were identified: the high-risk group including animal slurries, waste waters and biosolids (1.21±0.14%); the medium-risk group including solid manure, composts+fertilizers, and crop residues+fertilizers (0.35±0.13%); and the low-risk group including composts, crop residues, paper mill sludge and pellets (0.02±0.13%). The EF was higher when soils received organic amendments in combination with synthetic fertilizers, such as liquid manures+fertilizers (2.14±0.53%), composts+fertilizers (0.37±0.24%), and crop residues+fertilizers (0.59±0.27%). The EF was modulated by amendment (C/N ratio), soil (texture, drainage, organic C and N) and climatic (precipitation) factors. For example, EFs were on average 2.8 times greater in fine-textured than coarse-textured soils. We recommend site-specific EFs that consider organic amendment chemistry, soil characteristics, climate conditions and whether the organic amendment is applied alone or in combination with synthetic fertilizers.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0167-8809
1873-2305
DOI:10.1016/j.agee.2016.11.021