Major Movement: Examining Meta-Major Switching at Community Colleges
Evidence of inefficient course-taking patterns at community colleges has spurred policy conversations about how to ensure effective course sequences. Structural reforms, like guided pathways, seek to reduce major switching as a means to streamline student course taking and eliminate unnecessary cred...
Saved in:
Published in | Review of higher education Vol. 44; no. 2; pp. 189 - 235 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Johns Hopkins University Press
2020
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Evidence of inefficient course-taking patterns at community colleges has spurred policy conversations about how to ensure effective course sequences. Structural reforms, like guided pathways, seek to reduce major switching as a means to streamline student course taking and eliminate unnecessary credits. By placing students into broad fields of study--called meta-majors--and encouraging persistence within that general field (where coursework narrows toward a specific program over time), community colleges may help students progress toward their desired degree. But how often do students leave that meta-major, and what predicts meta-major switching? We use national data to examine meta-major switching at community colleges. Our findings suggest that almost 40 percent of students switch between meta-majors (eight broad major fields, plus undecided) between their first and third years of college. We describe the varied destinations and predictors across origin meta-majors and consider implications for colleges as they seek to assess ongoing reforms. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0162-5748 1090-7009 1090-7009 |
DOI: | 10.1353/rhe.2020.0044 |