Cold Compress for Intrauterine Device Insertional Pain: A Randomized Control Trial

• Published in: Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.) Vol. 1; no. 1; pp. 227 - 231
• Main Authors: Hylton, Jordan, Milton, Sarah, Sima, Adam P, Karjane, Nicole W
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 01.01.2020; Mary Ann Liebert
• Subjects: contraception; insertional pain; intrauterine device; Original; Original Article; intrauterine device; contraception; insertional pain
• ISSN: 2688-4844; 2688-4844
• DOI: 10.1089/whr.2020.0056

Background: Pain with intrauterine device (IUD) insertion is identified as a barrier to uptake of this highly effective long-acting reversible contraceptive. Several studies have assessed the efficacy of interventions to alleviate patient discomfort associated with IUD insertion, but no interventions have been clearly shown to improve procedural pain. The aim of this study was to determine whether use of a cold compress on the abdomen during IUD insertion reduces pain. Materials and Methods: This was a prospective randomized control trial of women presenting to Virginia Commonwealth University for insertion of IUD from September 2016 to October 2017. A power analysis determined that 69 subjects were needed in each arm to detect a 30% reduction in pain with a power of 80%, significance value of p  < 0.05. One hundred forty-two participants were consented for the study, 69 were randomized to the control group, which received the usual management, and 73 were randomized to the study group, which received a cold compress to the abdomen before the procedure. In addition to data on the difference from pre- to postprocedure pain scales, we collected information regarding inserting provider type, gravidity/parity, body mass index, demographic information (age, race, insurance type, and level of education), history of IUD placement or cervical procedure, history of chronic pain, and the use of regular pain medications (defined as more than once per week). Statistical analysis was accomplished using t -test and chi square tests. Results: There was no difference in pre and postinsertional pain in those who received a cold compress versus the control during insertion of an IUD (3.4 vs. 3.5). The insertional pain was rated at 4.3 and 4.6 for patients who received the cold compress and the control group, respectively ( p  = 0.805). Conclusion: Although a cold compress is a simple, inexpensive, and safe method of pain control, this study shows no reduction in insertional pain for IUD placement.