Son preference and sex differentials in receipt of key dimensions of children's healthcare: Evidence from Pakistan
Almost all research on son preference and the consequent sex differentials in child health has focused on India. Pakistan-a country with the second strongest stated desire for sons, no evidence of sex-selective abortion, and relatively high fertility-offers a different context in which to understand...
Saved in:
Published in | Population studies Vol. 76; no. 2; pp. 309 - 328 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
Routledge
04.05.2022
Population Investigation Committee, London School of Economics and Political Science |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Almost all research on son preference and the consequent sex differentials in child health has focused on India. Pakistan-a country with the second strongest stated desire for sons, no evidence of sex-selective abortion, and relatively high fertility-offers a different context in which to understand unequal health outcomes for boys and girls. I use three rounds of the Pakistan Demographic and Health Survey to examine sex differentials in child healthcare receipt across different family contexts. I find evidence of generalized discrimination: all girls, regardless of sibling composition or birth order, are less likely to receive full immunization or medical treatment. I do not find evidence that girls with older sisters face greater discrimination than other girls. For boys, I find some evidence of selective preferential treatment: among larger families, first sons are more likely to receive healthcare than other sons or daughters. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0032-4728 1477-4747 |
DOI: | 10.1080/00324728.2022.2032290 |