Real-world dose escalation of biologics for moderate-to-severe psoriasis in the United States
To compare real-world dose escalation of risankizumab with other US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved biologic treatments for management of moderate-to-severe psoriasis (PsO) in the United States. The Merative® MarketScan® Research Database was used to identify adults with ≥2 medical claim...
Saved in:
Published in | The Journal of dermatological treatment Vol. 34; no. 1; p. 2200869 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
Taylor & Francis
31.12.2023
Taylor & Francis Group |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | To compare real-world dose escalation of risankizumab with other US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved biologic treatments for management of moderate-to-severe psoriasis (PsO) in the United States.
The Merative® MarketScan® Research Database was used to identify adults with ≥2 medical claims for PsO, ≥3 claims of the index biologic medication in the maintenance period, and ≥6 months continuous enrollment pre-induction and ≥6 months after initiation of the maintenance period. Dose escalation was defined as ≥2 dosing intervals where the average daily dose was ≥30% higher than the expected daily dose (per FDA-approved dosing). Comparisons between risankizumab and other cohorts were made using chi-square tests and logistic regression models.
At the 30% threshold, the percentage of patients with dose escalation in the full maintenance period was significantly lower with risankizumab (2.0%) compared with other drug classes (tumor necrosis factor, interleukin (IL)-12/23, IL-17, or other IL-23 inhibitors: 17.6%, 10.0%, 18.3%, or 7.1%, respectively; p < 0.0001 for each) and individual biologics (adalimumab, ustekinumab, secukinumab, ixekizumab, and guselkumab; 17.9%, 10.0%, 15.7%, 18.0%, and 7.2%, respectively; p < 0.0001).
A significantly lower proportion of risankizumab-treated patients with PsO had dose escalations compared with patients treated with other biologics. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0954-6634 1471-1753 |
DOI: | 10.1080/09546634.2023.2200869 |