Cyclosporine A transfer between high‐ and low‐density lipoproteins: Independent from lipid transfer protein I‐facilitated transfer of lipoprotein‐coated phospholipids because of high affinity of cyclosporine a for the protein component of lipoproteins

The objectives of this study were to determine if lipid transfer protein I (LTP I)‐facilitated phospholipid (PC) transfer activity regulates the plasma lipoprotein distribution of cyclosporine (CSA) and if the association of CSA with high‐density lipoproteins (HDL) is due to the high protein and/or...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of pharmaceutical sciences Vol. 90; no. 9; pp. 1308 - 1317
Main Authors Kwong, Mona, Sivak, Olena, Kwong, Evan H., Wasan, Kishor M.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Elsevier Inc 01.09.2001
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
Wiley
American Pharmaceutical Association
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The objectives of this study were to determine if lipid transfer protein I (LTP I)‐facilitated phospholipid (PC) transfer activity regulates the plasma lipoprotein distribution of cyclosporine (CSA) and if the association of CSA with high‐density lipoproteins (HDL) is due to the high protein and/or alterations in coat lipid content of HDL. To assess if LTP I‐facilitated PC transfer activity regulates the plasma lipoprotein distribution of CSA, 14C‐PC‐ or 3H‐CSA‐enriched HDL or low‐density lipoproteins (LDL) were incubated in T150 buffer [pH 7.4, containing a 14C‐PC‐ or 3H‐CSA‐free lipoprotein counterpart ± exogenous LTP I (1.0 μg protein/mL)] or in delipidated human plasma that contained 1.0 μg protein/mL of endogenous LTP I in the presence or absence of a monoclonal antibody TP1 (30 μg protein/mL) directed against LTP I for 90min at 37°C. To assess the influence of HDL subfraction lipid composition and structure on the plasma distribution of CSA, CSA at 1000ng of drug/mL of plasma was incubated in human plasma pretreated for 24hwith a lecithin:cholesterol acyltransferase (LCAT) inhibitor, dithionitrobenzoate (DTNB; 3mM). To assess the binding of CSA to apolipoproteins AI, AII, and B, increasing concentrations of CSA were added to a constant concentration of either apolipoprotein AI, AII, or B. Equilibrium dialysis was used to determine free and bound fractions and Scatchard plot analysis was used to determine binding coefficients. To assess the influence of hydrophobic core lipid volume on the plasma distribution of CSA, CSA was incubated in plasma from patients with well‐characterized dyslipidemias. The hydrophobic core lipid volume (CE+TG) within each lipoprotein subfraction was correlated to the amount of CSA recovered in each plasma sample from the different human subjects. The percent transfer of PC from LDL to HDL was different than the percent transfer of CSA in T150 buffer or human plasma source. In the presence of TP1, only PC transfer from LDL to HDL decreased. For plasma incubated with CSA and separated into HDL2 and HDL3, 35–50% of drug originally incubated was recovered in the HDL3 fraction, with the remaining drug being found within the other fractions. When CSA was incubated in plasma pretreated with DTNB, the percentage of CSA recovered in the HDL3 and HDL2 fractions was not significantly different compared with that in the HDL3 and HDL2 fractions from untreated control plasma. CSA distribution into HDL inversely correlated with the hydrophobic core lipid volume of HDL, whereas distribution into LDL and triglyceride‐rich lipoproteins directly correlated with their respective hydrophobic core lipid volumes. We further observed that CSA has high binding affinity and multiple binding sites with apolipoproteins AI (kd = 188.9 nM; n = 2), AII (kd = 184.7 nM; n = 2), and B (kd = 191 nM; n = 3). These findings suggest that the transfer of CSA between different lipoprotein particles is not influenced by LTP I‐facilitated PC transfer activity probably because of the high affinity of CSA for the protein components of HDL and LDL. © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. and the American Pharmaceutical Association J Pharm Sci 90:1308–1317, 2001
Bibliography:istex:52475F1F01C80CF8E494D37BA16E757B1DF8073D
ArticleID:JPS1083
ark:/67375/WNG-QJJBSVQ2-X
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0022-3549
1520-6017
DOI:10.1002/jps.1083