Is there a role for fine-needle aspiration in radial scar/complex sclerosing lesions of the breast?

The fine‐needle aspiration cytology (FNA) from 12 mammographically detected, histologically confirmed radial scar/complex sclerosing lesions (RS/CSL) and their corresponding mammography were reviewed. Six aspirates were obtained by palpation, four by ultrasound guidance, and two by stereotactic guid...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inDiagnostic cytopathology Vol. 16; no. 6; pp. 537 - 542
Main Authors Greenberg, Merle L., Camaris, Catherine, Psarianos, Tina, Ung, Owen A., Lee, Warwick B.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 01.06.1997
Wiley-Liss
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The fine‐needle aspiration cytology (FNA) from 12 mammographically detected, histologically confirmed radial scar/complex sclerosing lesions (RS/CSL) and their corresponding mammography were reviewed. Six aspirates were obtained by palpation, four by ultrasound guidance, and two by stereotactic guidance. Of the eight lesions with sufficient material, five (62.5%) were reported as benign, two (25%) as atypical, and one (12.5%) as suspicious. It is proposed that FNA for RS/CSL should not be performed, and lesions require excision for histologic assessment. Diagn. Cytopathol. 16:537–542, 1997. © 1997 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-B6S0NHXL-L
ArticleID:DC13
istex:63BA271AB172AA3A49F77D8018AA47781B7D6BFB
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:8755-1039
1097-0339
DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0339(199706)16:6<537::AID-DC13>3.0.CO;2-J