Construction of a Genetic Linkage Map for the Olive Based on AFLP and SSR Markers
Genetic mapping is essential for quantitative trait locus (QTL) identification related to interesting traits. However, only two genetic maps on olive have yet been published, with very few transferable markers. We have constructed a linkage map of the olive according to a “two-way pseudo-testcross”...
Saved in:
Published in | Crop science Vol. 50; no. 6; pp. 2291 - 2302 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Madison
Crop Science Society of America
01.11.2010
American Society of Agronomy |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Genetic mapping is essential for quantitative trait locus (QTL) identification related to interesting traits. However, only two genetic maps on olive have yet been published, with very few transferable markers. We have constructed a linkage map of the olive according to a “two-way pseudo-testcross” mapping strategy and based on the progeny generated from a cross between ‘Picholine marocaine’ (female parent) × ‘Picholine du Languedoc’ (male parent) cultivars. A total of 592 markers (47 simple sequence repeat [SSR], 509 amplified fragment length polymorphism [AFLP], 27 inter-simple sequence repeat [ISSR], eight random amplified polymorphic DNA [RAPD], and one sequence characterized amplified region [SCAR] marker) were scored in 140 F1 progeny. Linkage groups were defined at a likelihood odds ratio score of 6.00 and a recombination fraction of 0.40. The maternal map consisted of 175 markers clustered into 40 linkage groups and spanning 1547.40 cM, while the paternal map was based on 170 markers clustered into 38 linkage groups and covering 1428.00 cM. For the consensus map, 345 markers were used covering 2366.4 cM and clustered into 49 linkage groups with a mean distance between two adjacent loci of 8.06 cM and the estimated map coverage of 72.6%. This integrated map provides a useful tool for the detection of QTLs controlling economically important traits. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | http://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2009.10.0632 All rights reserved. No part of this periodical may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Permission for printing and for reprinting the material contained herein has been obtained by the publisher. |
ISSN: | 0011-183X 1435-0653 |
DOI: | 10.2135/cropsci2009.10.0632 |