Determination of the normal spring stiffness coefficient in the linear spring–dashpot contact model of discrete element method

The discrete element method is a method for simulation of a particle system. For the “soft-sphere” mechanism of particle interactions, there are several models for normal contact forces, namely linear spring–dashpot, and non-linear damped Hertzian spring–dashpot, among others. The focus of this pape...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPowder technology Vol. 246; pp. 707 - 722
Main Authors Navarro, Helio A., de Souza Braun, Meire P.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Amsterdam Elsevier B.V 01.09.2013
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The discrete element method is a method for simulation of a particle system. For the “soft-sphere” mechanism of particle interactions, there are several models for normal contact forces, namely linear spring–dashpot, and non-linear damped Hertzian spring–dashpot, among others. The focus of this paper is to determine the normal spring stiffness coefficient of the linear model through the numerical solution for the overlap between particles in non-linear models. The linear spring stiffness is determined using equivalence between the linear and the nonlinear models. Using the MFIX computational code, the proposed approach is applied in the numerical simulations of two problems: single freely falling particle and bubbling fluidized bed. A method based on mean dimensionless overlap is suggested as an initial estimate to determine the normal spring stiffness coefficient. Other possible methods for computing the stiffness coefficient are also discussed in this work, e.g., maximum dimensionless overlap and dimensionless contact duration. [Display omitted] •Method for determination of the spring stiffness coefficient of the linear model•Analytical derivation of the linear spring–dashpot model•Description of two non-linear damped Hertzian spring–dashpot models•Non-dimensional expressions, tables and graphics for the models•MFIX simulations of two problems
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2013.05.049
ISSN:0032-5910
1873-328X
DOI:10.1016/j.powtec.2013.05.049