Comparative analysis of discrete and continuous absorption weighting estimators used in Monte Carlo simulations of radiative transport in turbid media

We examine the relative error of Monte Carlo simulations of radiative transport that employ two commonly used estimators that account for absorption differently, either discretely, at interaction points, or continuously, between interaction points. We provide a rigorous derivation of these discrete...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision Vol. 31; no. 2; p. 301
Main Authors Hayakawa, Carole K, Spanier, Jerome, Venugopalan, Vasan
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.02.2014
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:We examine the relative error of Monte Carlo simulations of radiative transport that employ two commonly used estimators that account for absorption differently, either discretely, at interaction points, or continuously, between interaction points. We provide a rigorous derivation of these discrete and continuous absorption weighting estimators within a stochastic model that we show to be equivalent to an analytic model, based on the radiative transport equation (RTE). We establish that both absorption weighting estimators are unbiased and, therefore, converge to the solution of the RTE. An analysis of spatially resolved reflectance predictions provided by these two estimators reveals no advantage to either in cases of highly scattering and highly anisotropic media. However, for moderate to highly absorbing media or isotropically scattering media, the discrete estimator provides smaller errors at proximal source locations while the continuous estimator provides smaller errors at distal locations. The origin of these differing variance characteristics can be understood through examination of the distribution of exiting photon weights.
ISSN:1520-8532
DOI:10.1364/JOSAA.31.000301