Fatigue and Voluntary Utilization of Automation in Simulated Driving

• Published in: Human factors Vol. 54; no. 5; pp. 734 - 746
• Main Authors: Neubauer, Catherine, Matthews, Gerald, Langheim, Lisa, Saxby, Dyani
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Los Angeles, CA SAGE Publications 01.10.2012; Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Alertness; Attention; Automation; Automobile drivers; Automobile Driving - psychology; Computer Simulation; Driver fatigue; Emergency response; Fatigue; Fatigue (materials); Female; Hazards; Human factors research; Humans; Male; Ohio; Safety; Simulation; Simulators; Space life sciences; Stress; Stress, Psychological; Task Performance and Analysis; Vehicles; Workload; Young Adult; Ohio; automation choice; workload; fatigue; driver behavior; individual differences
• ISSN: 0018-7208; 1547-8181
• DOI: 10.1177/0018720811423261

Objective: A driving simulator was used to assess the impact on fatigue, stress, and workload of full vehicle automation that was initiated by the driver. Background: Previous studies have shown that mandatory use of full automation induces a state of “passive fatigue” associated with loss of alertness. By contrast, voluntary use of automation may enhance the driver’s perceptions of control and ability to manage fatigue. Method: Participants were assigned to one of two experimental conditions, automation optional (AO) and nonautomation (NA), and then performed a 35-min, monotonous simulated drive. In the last 5 min, automation was unavailable and drivers were required to respond to an emergency event. Subjective state and workload were evaluated before and after the drive. Results: Making automation available to the driver failed to alleviate fatigue and stress states induced by driving in monotonous conditions. Drivers who were fatigued prior to the drive were more likely to choose to use automation, but automation use increased distress, especially in fatigue-prone drivers. Drivers in the AO condition were slower to initiate steering responses to the emergency event, suggesting optional automation may be distracting. Conclusion: Optional, driver-controlled automation appears to pose the same dangers to task engagement and alertness as externally initiated automation. Application: Drivers of automated vehicles may be vulnerable to fatigue that persists when normal vehicle control is restored. It is important to evaluate automated systems’ impact on driver fatigue, to seek design solutions to the issue of maintaining driver engagement, and to address the vulnerabilities of fatigue-prone drivers.