Vision restoration after brain and retina damage: The “residual vision activation theory”

• Published in: Progress in Brain Research Vol. 192; pp. 199 - 262
• Main Authors: Sabel, Bernhard A., Henrich-Noack, Petra, Fedorov, Anton, Gall, Carolin
• Format: Book Chapter Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Netherlands Elsevier Science & Technology 2011
• Subjects: Adaptation, Physiological; Animals; Brain Injuries - pathology; Brain Injuries - physiopathology; Brain Injuries - rehabilitation; current stimulation; Electric Stimulation; Eye Movements - physiology; Humans; Learning - physiology; Neuronal Plasticity - physiology; plasticity; Recovery of Function - physiology; rehabilitation; restoration; Retinal Diseases - pathology; Retinal Diseases - physiopathology; Retinal Diseases - rehabilitation; training; vision; Vision, Low - rehabilitation; Vision, Ocular - physiology; Visual Fields; vision; plasticity; rehabilitation; training; current stimulation; restoration
• ISBN: 9780444533555; 0444533559
• ISSN: 0079-6123; 1875-7855
• DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-53355-5.00013-0

Vision loss after retinal or cerebral visual injury (CVI) was long considered to be irreversible. However, there is considerable potential for vision restoration and recovery even in adulthood. Here, we propose the “residual vision activation theory” of how visual functions can be reactivated and restored. CVI is usually not complete, but some structures are typically spared by the damage. They include (i) areas of partial damage at the visual field border, (ii) “islands” of surviving tissue inside the blind field, (iii) extrastriate pathways unaffected by the damage, and (iv) downstream, higher-level neuronal networks. However, residual structures have a triple handicap to be fully functional: (i) fewer neurons, (ii) lack of sufficient attentional resources because of the dominant intact hemisphere caused by excitation/inhibition dysbalance, and (iii) disturbance in their temporal processing. Because of this resulting activation loss, residual structures are unable to contribute much to everyday vision, and their “non-use” further impairs synaptic strength. However, residual structures can be reactivated by engaging them in repetitive stimulation by different means: (i) visual experience, (ii) visual training, or (iii) noninvasive electrical brain current stimulation. These methods lead to strengthening of synaptic transmission and synchronization of partially damaged structures (within-systems plasticity) and downstream neuronal networks (network plasticity). Just as in normal perceptual learning, synaptic plasticity can improve vision and lead to vision restoration. This can be induced at any time after the lesion, at all ages and in all types of visual field impairments after retinal or brain damage (stroke, neurotrauma, glaucoma, amblyopia, age-related macular degeneration). If and to what extent vision restoration can be achieved is a function of the amount of residual tissue and its activation state. However, sustained improvements require repetitive stimulation which, depending on the method, may take days (noninvasive brain stimulation) or months (behavioral training). By becoming again engaged in everyday vision, (re)activation of areas of residual vision outlasts the stimulation period, thus contributing to lasting vision restoration and improvements in quality of life.