Improving health through policies that promote active travel: A review of evidence to support integrated health impact assessment

• Published in: Environment international Vol. 37; no. 4; pp. 766 - 777
• Main Authors: de Nazelle, Audrey, Nieuwenhuijsen, Mark J., Antó, Josep M., Brauer, Michael, Briggs, David, Braun-Fahrlander, Charlotte, Cavill, Nick, Cooper, Ashley R., Desqueyroux, Hélène, Fruin, Scott, Hoek, Gerard, Panis, Luc Int, Janssen, Nicole, Jerrett, Michael, Joffe, Michael, Andersen, Zorana Jovanovic, van Kempen, Elise, Kingham, Simon, Kubesch, Nadine, Leyden, Kevin M., Marshall, Julian D., Matamala, Jaume, Mellios, Giorgos, Mendez, Michelle, Nassif, Hala, Ogilvie, David, Peiró, Rosana, Pérez, Katherine, Rabl, Ari, Ragettli, Martina, Rodríguez, Daniel, Rojas, David, Ruiz, Pablo, Sallis, James F., Terwoert, Jeroen, Toussaint, Jean-François, Tuomisto, Jouni, Zuurbier, Moniek, Lebret, Erik
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Netherlands Elsevier Ltd 01.05.2011
• Subjects: Accidents, Traffic - statistics & numerical data; Active control; Air pollution; Air Pollution - adverse effects; Air Pollution - statistics & numerical data; Assessments; Bicycling - statistics & numerical data; Built environment; Cycling; Disease control; Environmental Exposure - statistics & numerical data; Environmental Policy; Exercise; Health; Health Behavior; Health Policy; Health Status; Hot Temperature - adverse effects; Humans; Noise, Transportation - adverse effects; Noise, Transportation - statistics & numerical data; Physical activity; Policies; Reduction; Risk; Risk assessment; Sunlight - adverse effects; Transportation - statistics & numerical data; Travel; Walking; Walking - statistics & numerical data; Physical activity; PM 2.5; GHG; Risk assessment; ADMS; CALINE; UFP; WHO; CO 2; HIA; Cycling; HEARTS; IPCC; PM 10; THE PEP; VOC; Built environment; CO; COPERT; PA; Walking; NO 2; ERF; Air pollution; VMT; NO x; MOBILE
• ISSN: 0160-4120; 1873-6750
• DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2011.02.003

Substantial policy changes to control obesity, limit chronic disease, and reduce air pollution emissions, including greenhouse gasses, have been recommended. Transportation and planning policies that promote active travel by walking and cycling can contribute to these goals, potentially yielding further co-benefits. Little is known, however, about the interconnections among effects of policies considered, including potential unintended consequences. We review available literature regarding health impacts from policies that encourage active travel in the context of developing health impact assessment (HIA) models to help decision-makers propose better solutions for healthy environments. We identify important components of HIA models of modal shifts in active travel in response to transport policies and interventions. Policies that increase active travel are likely to generate large individual health benefits through increases in physical activity for active travelers. Smaller, but population-wide benefits could accrue through reductions in air and noise pollution. Depending on conditions of policy implementations, risk tradeoffs are possible for some individuals who shift to active travel and consequently increase inhalation of air pollutants and exposure to traffic injuries. Well-designed policies may enhance health benefits through indirect outcomes such as improved social capital and diet, but these synergies are not sufficiently well understood to allow quantification at this time. Evaluating impacts of active travel policies is highly complex; however, many associations can be quantified. Identifying health-maximizing policies and conditions requires integrated HIAs. ► Active travel policies are growing in popularity worldwide. ► We review multiple benefits and potential risks associated with policies. ► Quantitative relationships for health impact assessments are discussed. ► Major health benefits are especially expected from physical activity outcomes. ► Well designed policies may enhance co-benefits and mitigate risks.