Maraviroc versus Efavirenz, Both in Combination with Zidovudine-Lamivudine, for the Treatment of Antiretroviral-Naive Subjects with CCR5-tropic HIV-1 Infection

Background. The MERIT (Maraviroc versus Efavirenz in Treatment-Naive Patients) study compared maraviroc and efavirenz, both with zidovudine-lamivudine, in antiretroviral-naive patients with R5 human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection. Methods. Patients screened for R5 HIV-1 were randomi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Journal of infectious diseases Vol. 201; no. 6; pp. 803 - 813
Main Authors Cooper, David A., Heera, Jayvant, Goodrich, James, Tawadrous, Margaret, Saag, Michael, DeJesus, Edwin, Clumeck, Nathan, Walmsley, Sharon, Ting, Naitee, Coakley, Eoin, Reeves, Jacqueline D., Reyes-Teran, Gustavo, Westby, Mike, Van Der Ryst, Elna, Ive, Prudence, Mohapi, Lerato, Mingrone, Horacio, Horban, Andrzej, Hackman, Frances, Sullivan, John, Mayer, Howard
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford The University of Chicago Press 15.03.2010
University of Chicago Press
Oxford University Press
Subjects
HIV
RNA
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background. The MERIT (Maraviroc versus Efavirenz in Treatment-Naive Patients) study compared maraviroc and efavirenz, both with zidovudine-lamivudine, in antiretroviral-naive patients with R5 human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection. Methods. Patients screened for R5 HIV-1 were randomized to receive efavirenz (600 mg once daily) or maraviroc (300 mg once or twice daily) with zidovudine-lamivudine. Coprimary end points were proportions of patients with a viral load <400 and <50 copies/mL at week 48; the noninferiority of maraviroc was assessed. Results. The once-daily maraviroc arm was discontinued for not meeting prespecified noninferiority criteria. In the primary 48-week analysis (n=721), maraviroc was noninferior for <400 copies/mL (70.6% for maraviroc vs 73.1% for efavirenz) but not for <50 copies/mL (65.3% vs 69.3%) at a threshold of −10%. More maraviroc patients discontinued for lack of efficacy (11.9% vs 4.2%), but fewer discontinued for adverse events (4.2% vs 13.6%). In a post hoc reanalysis excluding 107 patients (15%) with non-R5 screening virus by the current, more sensitive tropism assay, the lower bound of the 1-sided 97.5% confidence interval for the difference between treatment groups was above −10% for each end point. Conclusions. Twice-daily maraviroc was not noninferior to efavirenz at <50 copies/mL in the primary analysis. However, 15% of patients would have been ineligible for inclusion by a more sensitive screening assay. Their retrospective exclusion resulted in similar response rates in both arms Trial registration. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: (NCT00098293).
Bibliography:istex:98339697BED37E349F03C9BEC1F29DB291FDB047
ark:/67375/HXZ-47F4447Q-Q
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0022-1899
1537-6613
1537-6613
DOI:10.1086/650697