The effect of differing radiotherapeutic schedules on the response of glottic carcinoma of the larynx

• Published in: European journal of cancer (1990) Vol. 29; no. 4; pp. 501 - 510
• Main Authors: Robertson, A.G., Symonds, R.P., Robertson, C., Boyle, P., Wheldon, T.E.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Elsevier Ltd 1993
• Subjects: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Female; Glottis; Humans; Laryngeal Neoplasms - radiotherapy; Linear Models; Male; Middle Aged; Prognosis; Radiotherapy Dosage; Time Factors
• ISSN: 0959-8049; 1879-0852
• DOI: 10.1016/S0959-8049(05)80139-X

Laryngeal tumours, especially T1N0M0 and T2N0M0 lesions, are readily controlled by radiotherapy. Studies have shown that control varies with the dose of radiotherapy delivered to the tumour. Other factors, including the dose per fraction and the time over which the treatment schedule is delivered are also important. The varying biological effectiveness of a number of different dose fraction time schedules used in the management of laryngeal tumours of different stages are considered, the end points being tumour control and associated morbidity. Special attention has been given to the length of time over which the schedule is delivered. Of the schedules examined the results would suggest that a dose of 60 Gy given in 25 fractions over a period of 35 days is the best of the six schedules studied for T1, T2, T3 and T4 lesions with minimal associated morbidity. It is possible, however, that the poor results shown on the Kaplan-Meier curves for patients treated with the schedule of 60 Gy in 30 fractions over a period of 42 days could be due to geographical misses of the tumours as 56% were treated without a beam directed shell. The poor result obtained when patients were treated with the schedule of 60 Gy given in 30 fractions over 49+ days may be due to tumour repopulation occurring during the rest period though the possibility of geographical misses may contribute to the poor tumour control results. Mathematical modelling using linear quadratic analysis suggests that the shorter the period of time over which the treatment is given the better chance of achieving tumour control irrespective of the stage of the disease. These models were developed for patients treated with a beam directed shell thus excluding those patients who are most likely to be at risk from a geographic miss of the tumour. Linear quadratic analysis of the treatment data suggests that the ratio α/β for tumour cells is estimated in the region of 13 Gy. For T1 lesions the tumour doubling time is in the order of 6 days, with longer doubling times for the more advanced stages. The analysis provides some support for investigative use of accelerated treatment schedules. This analysis also shows the importance of using beam directed shells when treating small fields especially in the head and neck region.