Distance decay of similarity among European urban floras: the impact of anthropogenic activities on β diversity

We examine how two categories of non-native species (archaeophyte and neophyte, introduced before and after ad 1500, respectively) have had different impacts on β diversity across European urban floras. Our goal is to use the unique biological perspective provided by urban areas, and the contrasting...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inGlobal ecology and biogeography Vol. 17; no. 3; pp. 363 - 371
Main Authors La Sorte, Frank A, McKinney, Michael L, Pyšek, Petr, Klotz, Stefan, Rapson, G.L, Celesti-Grapow, Laura, Thompson, Ken
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.05.2008
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Blackwell Publishing
Blackwell
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:We examine how two categories of non-native species (archaeophyte and neophyte, introduced before and after ad 1500, respectively) have had different impacts on β diversity across European urban floras. Our goal is to use the unique biological perspective provided by urban areas, and the contrasting historical and geographical perspectives provided by archaeophytes and neophytes, to infer how non-native species will impact upon β diversity in the future. Twenty-two urban areas located in seven European countries. We used the β-sim dissimilarity index to estimate the level of β diversity for 231 unique pair-wise combinations of 22 urban floras. We examined bivariate plots of dissimilarity by geographical separation of city centres to evaluate distance decay of similarity for native species, archaeophytes and neophytes. Based on average percentages, 52.8% (SD = 8.2%) of species in the urban floras were identified as non-native with 28.3% (SD = 6.9%) classified as neophytes and 24.5% (SD = 4.9%) as archaeophytes. Relative to native species, across urban floras, archaeophytes were associated with higher compositional similarity and weaker distance decay patterns, whereas neophytes were associated with lower compositional similarity and stronger distance decay patterns. Across European urban floras, archaeophytes and neophytes occurred in similar numbers but archaeophytes were consistently associated with lower β diversity and neophytes with higher β diversity. Thus, the impact of non-native species on β diversity can be determined, at least in part, through their historical and geographical associations with anthropogenic activities. If archaeophytes represent the long-term biogeographical outcome for human commensal species, neophytes could develop similar patterns. The consequences, however, are likely to be more substantial ecologically and geographically due to the increasing numbers of neophytes and their global anthropogenic associations. Nevertheless, at present, our findings suggest that, based on occurrence information, neophytes have not achieved this state with European urban floras retaining regionally distinct assemblages of neophytes.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2007.00369.x
istex:60689E91B7B3F8005A0E509B2E1B0A0116250BCF
ArticleID:GEB369
ark:/67375/WNG-CM0C3ZBJ-X
ISSN:1466-822X
1466-8238
DOI:10.1111/j.1466-8238.2007.00369.x