Risk factors for variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease: A case-control study

Objective To investigate the potential risk factors for variant Creutzfeldt‐Jakob disease (VCJD) in the United Kingdom. Methods Definite and probable vCJD cases (n = 136) were residing in Great Britain at disease onset, and were referred between May 1995 and November 2003. Control subjects (n = 922)...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAnnals of neurology Vol. 59; no. 1; pp. 111 - 120
Main Authors Ward, Hester J. T., Everington, Dawn, Cousens, Simon N., Smith-Bathgate, Blaire, Leitch, Margaret, Cooper, Sarah, Heath, Craig, Knight, Richard S. G., Smith, Peter G., Will, Robert G.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 01.01.2006
Willey-Liss
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objective To investigate the potential risk factors for variant Creutzfeldt‐Jakob disease (VCJD) in the United Kingdom. Methods Definite and probable vCJD cases (n = 136) were residing in Great Britain at disease onset, and were referred between May 1995 and November 2003. Control subjects (n = 922) were recruited between 2002 and 2003, from 100 randomly selected geographical clusters sampled to represent the geographical distribution of vCJD. Results Reported frequent consumption of beef and beef products thought likely to contain mechanically recovered or head meat, or both, including burgers and meat pies, was associated with increased risk for vCJD, as was reported frequent chicken consumption. Surgical operations were generally similarly reported for cases and control subjects, with the exception of a small group of minor operations, possibly attributable to underreporting in control subjects. Cases and control subjects had similar reported occupational histories and exposure to animals. Interpretation These findings are consistent with dietary exposure to contaminated beef products being the main route of infection of vCJD, but recall bias cannot be excluded. There was no convincing evidence of increased risk through medical, surgical, or occupational exposure or exposure to animals. Ann Neurol 2005
Bibliography:ArticleID:ANA20708
Lothian Multi-Research Ethics Committee - No. MREC/02/0/81
ark:/67375/WNG-R9QXWWMW-W
UK Department of Health - No. 121/7400
istex:0216C6C3565773A7AC582D1E57C503D61AFC7F65
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0364-5134
1531-8249
DOI:10.1002/ana.20708