Repair of medial meniscus posterior root tear is effective for root healing and cartilage regeneration in opening wedge high tibial osteotomy

• Published in: Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA Vol. 31; no. 12; pp. 5799 - 5811
• Main Authors: Choi, Yun Seong, Chang, Moon Jong, Lee, Ji Han, Lee, Jae Hee, D’Lima, Darryl D., Kim, Tae Woo, Chang, Chong Bum, Kang, Seung-Baik
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01.12.2023; Springer‐Verlag; John Wiley & Sons, Inc
• Subjects: Arthroscopy; Cartilage; Cartilage regeneration; Clinical outcomes; Clinical trials; Fractures; Healing; Knee; Medial meniscus posterior root tear; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Meniscus; Microfracture; Opening wedge high tibial osteotomy; Orthopedics; Osteotomy; Patients; Regeneration; Root repair; Sports Medicine; Subgroups; Surgery; Cartilage regeneration; Opening wedge high tibial osteotomy; Root repair; Medial meniscus posterior root tear
• ISSN: 0942-2056; 1433-7347; 1433-7347
• DOI: 10.1007/s00167-023-07637-z

Purpose This study aimed to determine whether the repair of a medial meniscus posterior root tear (MMPRT) is effective for MMPRT healing, cartilage regeneration, and clinical outcomes in opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO). Methods This retrospective study included 80 patients who underwent OWHTO and subsequent second-look arthroscopy. The patients were divided into OWHTO-with-MMPRT-repair ( n  = 40) and OWHTO alone ( n  = 40) groups, and the healing rates (complete/partial/failure) were compared. Each group was further divided into over- and under-corrected subgroups to compare healing rates. The International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) grade, cartilage defect size, Koshino stage, ICRS cartilage repair assessment score of the medial femoral condyle (MFC), and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores between the OWHTO-with-MMPRT-repair and OWHTO alone groups were compared according to whether microfracture was performed on the MFC. Results The overall healing rate of the MMPRT was higher in the OWHTO-with-MMPRT-repair group than that in the OWHTO alone group ( P  < 0.001). In addition, in the subgroup analysis, no difference in the MMPRT healing rate between the over-correction and under-correction groups when MMPRT repair was performed (n.s). In contrast, without MMPRT repair, the healing rate was lower in the under-correction group than that in the over-correction group ( P  = 0.03). Cartilage regeneration of the OWHTO-with-MMPRT-repair group was superior to that of the OWHTO alone group ( P  < 0.05). The IKDC subjective scores of the OWHTO-with-MMPRT-repair and OWHTO alone groups were 34.5 and 33.1 before surgery (n.s) and 50 and 47.2 at one year after surgery, respectively (n.s). These differences between the two groups for cartilage regeneration and IKDC subjective scores showed the same pattern regardless of microfractures. Conclusions MMPRT repair during OWHTO might improve MMPRT healing, even with under-correction, and cartilage regeneration of MFC, regardless of microfracture. However, OWHTO with MMPRT repair might not improve short-term clinical outcomes compared to OWHTO alone. Further randomized clinical trials are necessary. Level of evidence III, Retrospective cohort study.