Dietary intervention for oral allergy syndrome as a treatment in orofacial granulomatosis: a new approach?

Background Orofacial granulomatosis (OFG) is a chronic granulomatous condition of the mouth, face and lips. Recent work demonstrates a high rate of atopy and silver birch sensitisation from skin prick testing (SPT). Oral allergy syndrome (OAS) is an acute oro‐pharyngeal IgE mediated reaction, trigge...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of oral pathology & medicine Vol. 42; no. 7; pp. 517 - 522
Main Authors Campbell, H., Escudier, M. P., Brostoff, J., Patel, P., Milligan, P., Challacombe, S. J., Sanderson, J. D., Lomer, M. C. E.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Frederiksberg Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.08.2013
Wiley
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background Orofacial granulomatosis (OFG) is a chronic granulomatous condition of the mouth, face and lips. Recent work demonstrates a high rate of atopy and silver birch sensitisation from skin prick testing (SPT). Oral allergy syndrome (OAS) is an acute oro‐pharyngeal IgE mediated reaction, triggered by foods that cross react with pollens, most commonly silver birch. The aim of this study was to determine if patients with OFG and positive SPT to common OAS associated pollens responded to avoidance of cross reactive foods. Methods Patients with OFG and positive SPT to silver birch, grass, mugwort, ragweed and latex were required to avoid cross reacting foods, for 6 weeks and, in those who responded, for a total of 12 weeks. All had standardized oral examinations and were given severity scores (SS) at each appointment. Results Twenty two of 47 (47%) patients had one or more positive SPT and 13/22 completed 6 weeks on the diet. No difference was seen in SS between weeks 0 (14.62 ± 11.16) and 6 (13.31 ± 10.33; P = 0.656). Six of 14 (43%) had significantly improved SS (week 0; 19.17 ± 12.95, week 6; 10.83 ± 4.99, P = 0.027). Five completed 12 weeks and no further improvement was seen (week 6; 11 ± 5.57, week 12; 10.4 ± 9.94; P = 0.068). Two patients required no further treatments. Conclusions On an intention to treat basis, only 2/14 patients improved and required no further intervention. Whilst this diet cannot be recommended routinely, the improvement seen in some patients raises questions about the role of OAS in patients with OFG.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-XGMF79R8-R
Kings College London
Kings College London, UK
The National Institute of Health Research Comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre at Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
ArticleID:JOP12041
Guy's and St Thomas' Charity
istex:620F6F3EA11D72C34CC2C4D1DF21BD10534003BE
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0904-2512
1600-0714
DOI:10.1111/jop.12041