Postoperative Flexion Analysis of 3 Rotating-platform Knee Designs

• Published in: Orthopedics (Thorofare, N.J.) Vol. 35; no. 8; pp. e1159 - e1165
• Main Authors: Maniar, Rajesh N, Tushar, Singhi, Singh, Ashish, Gupta, Himanshu, Nanivadekar, Arun, Maniar, Parul Rajesh
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States SLACK INCORPORATED 01.08.2012
• Subjects: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - instrumentation; Body mass index; Demographics; Female; Humans; Knee; Knee Prosthesis; Male; Middle Aged; Orthopedics; Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery; Patients; Prosthesis Design; Range of motion; Range of Motion, Articular; Retrospective Studies; Transplants & implants
• ISSN: 0147-7447; 1938-2367
• DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20120725-13

Rotating-platform knee implants have successively undergone modifications to improve postoperative flexion. The cruciate-sacrificing Low Contact Stress (LCS) implant (DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc, Warsaw, Indiana) was modified into the cruciate-substituting PFC Sigma RP (ΣRP) implant and further into the PFC Sigma RPF (ΣRPF) implant (DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc). The goal of this study was to determine whether these modifications improved postoperative flexion. Postoperative flexion at 2 years was compared against preoperative flexion with regard to the general demographics of each group. Statistical analysis showed that the pre- to postoperative flexion changes achieved by the ΣRP (14.6°) and the ΣRPF (2.9°) were better (Statistical analysis showed that the pre- to postoperative flexion changes achieved by the ΣRP (14.6°) and the ΣRPF (2.9°) were better ( P <.001) than that achieved by the LCS (−10.3°); however, between the ΣRP (14.6°) and the ΣRPF (2.9°), the change was statistically insignificant ( P =.045). In subgroups with preoperative flexion less than 125°, postoperative flexion achieved was 100.1° with the LCS, 119.8° with the ΣRP, and 121.3° with the ΣRPF. The difference between the ΣRP and ΣRPF and the LCS was statistically significant ( P <.001), but between the ΣRP and the ΣRPF was statistically insignificant ( P =.621). In subgroups with preoperative flexion 125° or more, postoperative flexion was 125° with the LCS, 132° with the ΣRP, and 130° with the ΣRPF, with no significant difference between groups ( P =.416). Both cruciate-substituting designs produced better postoperative flexion than the cruciate-sacrificing design. The ΣRP, despite less preoperative flexion ( P =.004), achieved statistically better postoperative flexion than the LCS ( P <.001). In subgroups with comparable preoperative flexion, no statistical difference in postoperative flexion was achieved by the ΣRP and the ΣRPF.