Delineation of temporal bone anatomy: feasibility of low-dose 64-row CT in regard to image quality
The aim of our present study was to evaluate the visualization of anatomical landmarks of the temporal bone using a low-dose 64-slice computed tomography (CT) technique. A total of 120 patients were evaluated, 60 patients (mean age 47.1 years; 36 male, 24 female) underwent examination with a 4-slice...
Saved in:
Published in | European radiology Vol. 17; no. 10; pp. 2638 - 2645 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Germany
Springer Nature B.V
01.10.2007
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The aim of our present study was to evaluate the visualization of anatomical landmarks of the temporal bone using a low-dose 64-slice computed tomography (CT) technique. A total of 120 patients were evaluated, 60 patients (mean age 47.1 years; 36 male, 24 female) underwent examination with a 4-slice CT scanner: 180 mAs, 120 kV, 1 s rotation time, 2 x 0.5 mm collimation, 0.5 mm slice thickness. Another 60 consecutive patients (mean age 37.4 years; 43 male, 37 female) were examined using a 64-slice CT low-dose protocol: 140 mAs, 120 kV, 1 s rotation time, 12 x 0.6 mm collimation, 0.6 mm slice thickness. The visibility of 42 landmarks was scored by two blinded radiologists using a five-point quality rating scale. Mean equivalent dose was significantly lower for the 64-slice CT protocol (0.31 mSv +/- 0.12 mSv) compared to the 4-slice CT protocol (0.61 mSv +/- 0.08 mSv). Despite increased image noise, only 19% of the anatomical landmarks were delineated significantly better on the axial sections of the 4-slice CT and only 9.5% of the anatomical landmarks on the reformatted coronal images. The interobserver agreement did not differ significantly between the two modalities. Low-dose 64-slice CT technique facilitates temporal bone imaging with sufficient anatomical detail. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 |
ISSN: | 0938-7994 1432-1084 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00330-007-0578-1 |