Different doses of intermittent theta burst stimulation for upper limb motor dysfunction after stroke: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

• Published in: Frontiers in neuroscience Vol. 17; p. 1259872
• Main Authors: Tang, Zhiqing, Liu, Tianhao, Liu, Ying, Han, Kaiyue, Su, Wenlong, Zhao, Jingdu, Chi, Qianqian, Zhang, Xiaonian, Zhang, Hao
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Lausanne Frontiers Research Foundation 05.10.2023; Frontiers Media S.A
• Subjects: Clinical trials; Data collection; Dysarthria; Functional magnetic resonance imaging; Human subjects; intermittent theta burst stimulation; Magnetic fields; Magnetic resonance imaging; Neuroscience; Quality of life; randomized controlled trial; Rehabilitation; Stroke; study protocol; Substance abuse treatment; Transcranial magnetic stimulation; upper limb; Beijing China; China
• ISSN: 1662-453X; 1662-4548; 1662-453X
• DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1259872

Background Upper limb motor recovery is one of the important goals of stroke rehabilitation. Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS), a new type of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), is considered a potential therapy. However, there is still no consensus on the efficacy of iTBS for upper limb motor dysfunction after stroke. Stimulus dose may be an important factor affecting the efficacy of iTBS. Therefore, we aim to investigate and compare the effects and neural mechanisms of three doses of iTBS on upper limb motor recovery in stroke patients, and our hypothesis is that the higher the dose of iTBS, the greater the improvement in upper limb motor function. Methods This prospective, randomized, controlled trial will recruit 56 stroke patients with upper limb motor dysfunction. All participants will be randomized in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to receive 21 sessions of 600 pulses active iTBS, 1,200 pulses active iTBS, 1,800 pulses active iTBS, or 1,800 pulses sham iTBS in addition to conventional rehabilitation training. The primary outcome is the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of the Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) score from baseline to end of intervention, and the secondary outcomes are the Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT), Grip Strength (GS), Modified Barthel Index (MBI), and Stroke Impact Scale (SIS). The FMA-UE, MBI, and SIS are assessed pre-treatment, post-treatment, and at the 3-weeks follow-up. The WMFT, GS, and resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) data will be obtained pre- and post-treatment. Discussion The iTBS intervention in this study protocol is expected to be a potential method to promote upper limb motor recovery after stroke, and the results may provide supportive evidence for the optimal dose of iTBS intervention.