Nutrient recovery from anaerobic sludge by membrane filtration: pilot tests at a 2.5 MWe biogas plant

• Published in: International journal of recycling of organic waste in agriculture Vol. 7; no. 4; pp. 325 - 334
• Main Authors: Gienau, T., Brüß, U., Kraume, M., Rosenberger, S.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01.12.2018; Islamic Azad University, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch; Oxford International Collaboration Centre Press (OICC press)
• Subjects: Agricultural practices; Ammonia; Anaerobic digestion; Aquatic Pollution; Biogas; Cleaning; Decantation; Earth and Environmental Science; Economic conditions; Economics; Energy demand; Environment; Fertiliser; Fertilizers; Filtration; Membrane filtration; Nutrient recovery; Nutrients; Optimization; Original Research; Phosphorus; Phosphorus pentoxide; Pilot plants; Potassium; Reverse osmosis; Separation; Sludge; Total conditioning process; Ultrafiltration; Ultrafiltration and reverse osmosis treatment; Waste Water Technology; Water Management; Water Pollution Control; Water purification; Total conditioning process; Ultrafiltration and reverse osmosis treatment; Nutrient recovery; Fertiliser; Anaerobic digestion
• ISSN: 2195-3228; 2251-7715
• DOI: 10.1007/s40093-018-0218-6

Purpose Membrane filtration is recently applied to recover nutrients and dischargeable water from anaerobic sludge. The purpose of this study is to quantify nutrient separation, membrane performance, and process stability and to increase the economical applicability of the process by energetic optimisation. Methods At the site of a 2.5 MW e agricultural biogas plant, a membrane pilot plant was operated over a period of 7 months. It consisted of a screw press separator, a decanter centrifuge, an ultrafiltration unit, and a three-stage reverse osmosis unit. Mass and nutrient balances were generated by sampling and analysing every process stream. Process performance was analysed by monitoring separation efficiencies, membrane flux, cleaning intervals, and energy demand. Results Solid/liquid separation resulted in separation efficiencies of 70% for total solids and 80% for phosphorus. The solid fraction contained high concentrations of organics and particle-ligated nutrients (20% TS, 8 kg t −1 N total , 5.5 kg t −1 P 2 O 5 ). The retentate of the reverse osmosis had high concentrations of dissolved ammonia and potassium (4 kg t −1 NH 4 –N and 10 kg t −1 K 2 O). 38% of the sludge volume was recovered as clean water. Conclusion The membrane pilot plant successfully produced a solid N/P-fertiliser, a liquid N/K-fertiliser and clean water. The results contribute to a sound understanding and growing database for future adaption of the process chain. Hydrodynamic optimisation within the pilot plant reduced the energy demand of the ultrafiltration step by 50%, which considerably contributes to the economy of the process.