Audiovisual Integration of Speech Falters under High Attention Demands

One of the most commonly cited examples of human multisensory integration occurs during exposure to natural speech, when the vocal and the visual aspects of the signal are integrated in a unitary percept. Audiovisual association of facial gestures and vocal sounds has been demonstrated in nonhuman p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCurrent biology Vol. 15; no. 9; pp. 839 - 843
Main Authors Alsius, Agnès, Navarra, Jordi, Campbell, Ruth, Soto-Faraco, Salvador
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Elsevier Inc 10.05.2005
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0960-9822
1879-0445
DOI10.1016/j.cub.2005.03.046

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:One of the most commonly cited examples of human multisensory integration occurs during exposure to natural speech, when the vocal and the visual aspects of the signal are integrated in a unitary percept. Audiovisual association of facial gestures and vocal sounds has been demonstrated in nonhuman primates [1] and in prelinguistic children [2], arguing for a general basis for this capacity. One critical question, however, concerns the role of attention in such multisensory integration. Although both behavioral and neurophysiological studies have converged on a preattentive conceptualization of audiovisual speech integration [3–8], this mechanism has rarely been measured under conditions of high attentional load, when the observers’ attention resources are depleted [9]. We tested the extent to which audiovisual integration was modulated by the amount of available attentional resources by measuring the observers’ susceptibility to the classic McGurk illusion [3] in a dual-task paradigm [10]. The proportion of visually influenced responses was severely, and selectively, reduced if participants were concurrently performing an unrelated visual or auditory task. In contrast with the assumption that crossmodal speech integration is automatic, our results suggest that these multisensory binding processes are subject to attentional demands.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0960-9822
1879-0445
DOI:10.1016/j.cub.2005.03.046