The nosology of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder

This study examined five central issues regarding the classification of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in an epidemiologically derived sample of primary school children. A monothetic schema (DSM-III) differed from a polythetic-only schema (DSM-III-R) by having a higher frequency of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Vol. 32; no. 1; p. 155
Main Authors August, G J, Garfinkel, B D
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.01.1993
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This study examined five central issues regarding the classification of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in an epidemiologically derived sample of primary school children. A monothetic schema (DSM-III) differed from a polythetic-only schema (DSM-III-R) by having a higher frequency of comorbid conduct disorder. A pervasive model was too restrictive, identifying only the most severe disruptive or conduct disordered children. Raising the minimum threshold above eight symptoms (DSM-III-R) missed less disruptive children who nevertheless exhibit significant functional impairment. There was minimal support for the independence of a syndrome of attention deficit disorder without hyperactivity (DSM-III). Finally, ADHD patients commonly have other diagnoses, most frequently conduct disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, and anxiety disorder.
ISSN:0890-8567
DOI:10.1097/00004583-199301000-00023