The nosology of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder
This study examined five central issues regarding the classification of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in an epidemiologically derived sample of primary school children. A monothetic schema (DSM-III) differed from a polythetic-only schema (DSM-III-R) by having a higher frequency of...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Vol. 32; no. 1; p. 155 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
01.01.1993
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get more information |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | This study examined five central issues regarding the classification of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in an epidemiologically derived sample of primary school children. A monothetic schema (DSM-III) differed from a polythetic-only schema (DSM-III-R) by having a higher frequency of comorbid conduct disorder. A pervasive model was too restrictive, identifying only the most severe disruptive or conduct disordered children. Raising the minimum threshold above eight symptoms (DSM-III-R) missed less disruptive children who nevertheless exhibit significant functional impairment. There was minimal support for the independence of a syndrome of attention deficit disorder without hyperactivity (DSM-III). Finally, ADHD patients commonly have other diagnoses, most frequently conduct disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, and anxiety disorder. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0890-8567 |
DOI: | 10.1097/00004583-199301000-00023 |