Clonal differences in susceptibility to the dieback of Fraxinus excelsior in southern Sweden

Ash dieback damage was assessed and analysed on 16–22 year-old grafts in two ash seed orchards (Fraxinus excelsior L.). The grafts originated from 106 plus-tree clones selected from 27 stands in southern Sweden based on their phenotypes. The results obtained indicate that ash dieback disease is stro...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inScandinavian journal of forest research Vol. 28; no. 3; pp. 205 - 216
Main Author Stener, Lars-Göran
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oslo Taylor & Francis Group 01.04.2013
Taylor & Francis LLC
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Ash dieback damage was assessed and analysed on 16–22 year-old grafts in two ash seed orchards (Fraxinus excelsior L.). The grafts originated from 106 plus-tree clones selected from 27 stands in southern Sweden based on their phenotypes. The results obtained indicate that ash dieback disease is strongly genotypically controlled. There was considerable genotypic variation among individuals. None of the clones seemed to be totally resistant, but some exhibited reduced susceptibility and retained this resistance after 6 years under heavy infection pressure. Autumn phenology based on leaf coloration was subject to moderate genetic control (H² = 0.19). The genetic correlation between autumn phenology and damage was weak to moderate (rG from 0.38 to 0.60) and positive, indicating that susceptible clones have a prolonged growing season. There was no evidence suggesting that stands differed in susceptibility. Together with the high heritability of resistance, strong age×age correlations and weak genotype×environment interactions, this suggests there is good scope for breeding less susceptible trees for the future.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2012.735699
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1651-1891
0282-7581
1651-1891
DOI:10.1080/02827581.2012.735699