Prevalence and a correlation analysis of discoid meniscus and femoral trochlear dysplasia

• Published in: BMC musculoskeletal disorders Vol. 24; no. 1; pp. 1 - 923
• Main Authors: Qiao, Yi, Zhang, Xiuyuan, Wu, Chenliang, Xu, Caiqi, Sun, Zhenkui, Zhao, Jinzhong, Zhao, Song
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London BioMed Central 30.11.2023; BMC
• Subjects: Asymptomatic; Classification; Congenital defects; Congenital diseases; Congenital malformation; Correlation analysis; Discoid meniscus; Dysplasia; Femoral trochlear dysplasia; Femur; Frontotemporal dementia; Joint and ligament injuries; Knee; Magnetic resonance imaging; Meniscus; Population; Population studies; Prevalence; Surgery
• ISSN: 1471-2474; 1471-2474
• DOI: 10.1186/s12891-023-06958-x

Abstract Background Discoid meniscus (DM) and femoral trochlear dysplasia (FTD) are common knee disorders. Both as congenital malformation, whether there is a connection between them is unclear and the research on their prevalence in the general population is inadequate. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of FTD and DM in the general population through a large sample size, and to explore the relationship between them. Study design Retrospective study. Methods Patients undergoing knee magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations at our outpatient clinic were screened and 1003 patients were enrolled in DM group with 989 patients in non-DM (NDM) group. The type of DM and FTD was classified with Watanabe classification and Dejour’s classification, respectively. The prevalence of FTD and DM in the general population and the relationship between them were evaluated. Results The prevalence of DM and FTD was 10.0% and 14.5%, respectively. The overall percentage of FTD was higher in DM group (P < 0.001). The DM group has a higher percentage of all types of FTD except type D (P < 0.05), and a higher percentage of both low- and high-grade FTD (P < 0.001). There were 633 cases of type I DM and 370 cases of type II DM. The overall percentage of FTD was not significantly different between the two types (P = 0.106). No significant difference was detected for all types of FTD except type B (P < 0.05). The Type I DM group has a significant higher percentage of high-grade FTD than Type II group (P < 0.05). Conclusion Patients with a DM are more likely to have FTD regardless of the type of DM, while those with a type I DM are more prone to have a high grade FTD.