Breeding and post-breeding responses of woodland birds to modification of habitat structure by deer

• Published in: Biological conservation Vol. 144; no. 9; pp. 2151 - 2162
• Main Authors: Holt, Chas A., Fuller, Robert J., Dolman, Paul M.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Kidlington Elsevier Ltd 01.09.2011; Elsevier
• Subjects: Aegithalos caudatus; Animal, plant and microbial ecology; Applied ecology; Aves; Biological and medical sciences; Birds; breeding; Browsing; canopy; Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife; Deer; Density; Exclosure study; forage quality; Forages; foraging; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; gardens; Habitat structure; habitats; herbivores; Invertebrate; Invertebrates; juveniles; landscapes; leaves; Luscinia megarhynchos; Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking; plant response; population growth; Prunella; Prunella modularis; Regenerating vegetation; shrubs; Sylvia; Sylvia borin; understory; Vegetation; Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution; Woodland bird; Woodlands; North America; Europe; Invertebrate; Regenerating vegetation; Woodland bird; Habitat structure; Deer; Exclosure study; Modification; Exclosure; Woodland; Vertebrata; Reproduction; Mammalia; Vegetation; Cervidae; Habitat; Artiodactyla; Aves; Invertebrata; Ungulata; Environmental protection
• ISSN: 0006-3207; 1873-2917
• DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2011.05.004

► Deer reduce canopy cover and shrub layer foliage density in young woodland. ► We examined avian use of browsed and unbrowsed vegetation through standardised mist-netting. ► Understorey species, such as dunnock, responded most negatively to deer. ► A shift to young re-growth by some resident species during the post-breeding season was detected. Birds in woodland can be affected by increasing deer populations through changes to vegetation structure and potential impacts on foraging resources; these effects need to be better understood. Effects of deer browsing are reported from a replicated split-plot exclusion experiment in English coppiced woodland. All stages of growth were examined up to eight years after felling. We used standardised mist-netting (totaling 1920 h) to sample birds in breeding and post-breeding periods. Deer browsing strongly altered vegetation structure by reducing canopy cover and shrub layer foliage density. However deer did not affect invertebrate density per unit of foliage, providing no evidence of an ungulate-mediated plant chemical response affecting forage quality for invertebrate herbivores. At avian guild level, significantly more ground and understorey foraging birds were captured where deer were excluded, and negative responses to browsing were more marked for pooled migrants than pooled residents. At the species level, especially pronounced negative effects were evident for dunnock ( Prunella modularis) and garden warbler ( Sylvia borin); approximately five times more dunnocks were captured in deer exclosures than in browsed vegetation. We also detected negative responses to browsing by nightingale ( Luscinia megarhynchos) and long-tailed tit ( Aegithalos caudatus). No significant positive responses to browsing were detected. For some species the use of young re-growth increased post breeding relative to the breeding period, including a marked shift by pooled residents that involved a disproportionate number of juveniles. Previous studies in North America have shown that, through vegetation modification, ungulate activity can alter woodland bird assemblages; as far as we are aware this is the first experimental demonstration of effects in Europe, and at low to moderate browsing intensity typical of the wider landscape scale.