Intraoperative imprint cytology of sentinel nodes in breast cancer
Background and Objectives Sentinel node (SN) biopsy is a new standard of care for axillary node staging in patients with early‐stage, clinically node‐negative breast cancer. A second operation can be avoided when the results are available intraoperatively. However, there is no standard intraoperativ...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of surgical oncology Vol. 86; no. 3; pp. 128 - 133 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Hoboken
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
01.06.2004
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Background and Objectives
Sentinel node (SN) biopsy is a new standard of care for axillary node staging in patients with early‐stage, clinically node‐negative breast cancer. A second operation can be avoided when the results are available intraoperatively. However, there is no standard intraoperative method for SN assessment. The aim of this study was to evaluate intraoperative imprint cytology (IC) for the detection of SN involvement in patients with early‐stage breast cancer.
Methods
One hundred eighty‐five consecutive patients with a breast tumor underwent SN biopsy with intraoperative IC. The SN was bisected and a touch preparation was made with a glass slide, on both sides of the cut. Permanent sections were evaluated with H&E and immunohistochemical staining. The IC results were compared with the final histologic results.
Results
The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values of IC were 33.3, 78.4, 78.9, 90, and 77.5%, respectively. IC was more sensitive for macrometastases than for micrometastases. In the 118 patients studied after the learning phase, 9 patients with a positive SN by IC avoided a second operation.
Conclusions
Intraoperative IC of SNs appears to be reasonably reliable in patients with breast cancer, permitting axillary dissection during the same surgical procedure when positive. In contrast, sensitivity for detection of micrometastases is low. J. Surg. Oncol. 2004;86:128–133. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ark:/67375/WNG-1FKCS191-P istex:CB854C268242CB710FDA8AB6BBC4580C70F8D898 ArticleID:JSO20067 ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-3 content type line 23 ObjectType-Review-1 |
ISSN: | 0022-4790 1096-9098 |
DOI: | 10.1002/jso.20067 |