The unimportance of the spurious root of time integration algorithms for structural dynamics

Most commonly used second‐order‐accurate, dissipative time integration algorithms for structural dynamics possess a spurious root. For an algorithm to be accurate, it has been suggested that the spurious root must be small and ideally be zero in the low‐frequency limit. In the paper we show that goo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCommunications in numerical methods in engineering Vol. 10; no. 8; pp. 591 - 597
Main Authors Hulbert, G. M., Chung, J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Sussex John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 01.08.1994
Wiley
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Most commonly used second‐order‐accurate, dissipative time integration algorithms for structural dynamics possess a spurious root. For an algorithm to be accurate, it has been suggested that the spurious root must be small and ideally be zero in the low‐frequency limit. In the paper we show that good accuracy can be achieved even if the spurious root does not tend towards zero in the low‐frequency limit. This permits more flexibility in the design of time integration algorithms. As an example, we present an algorithm that has greater accuracy than several other dissipative algorithms even though for all frequencies its spurious root is non‐zero. We also show that the degraded performance of the Bazzi‐ρ algorithm is not due to its non‐zero spurious root.
Bibliography:ArticleID:CNM1640100803
istex:02F19CE5B124A76984F11A005B0DDF883B283E3F
ark:/67375/WNG-V1HX70BH-D
Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering and Applied Mechanics.
Graduate Research Assistant.
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:1069-8299
1099-0887
DOI:10.1002/cnm.1640100803