SARS‐CoV‐2 infection in pregnancy in Denmark—characteristics and outcomes after confirmed infection in pregnancy: A nationwide, prospective, population‐based cohort study

Introduction Assessing the risk factors for and consequences of infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) during pregnancy is essential to guide clinical care. Previous studies on SARS‐CoV‐2 infection in pregnancy have been among hospitalized patients, which may hav...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica Vol. 100; no. 11; pp. 2097 - 2110
Main Authors Aabakke, Anna J. M., Krebs, Lone, Petersen, Tanja G., Kjeldsen, Frank S., Corn, Giulia, Wøjdemann, Karen, Ibsen, Mette H., Jonsdottir, F., Rønneberg, Elisabeth, Andersen, Charlotte S., Sundtoft, Iben, Clausen, Tine, Milbak, Julie, Burmester, Lars, Lindved, Birgitte, Thorsen‐Meyer, Annette, Khalil, Mohammed R., Henriksen, Birgitte, Jønsson, Lisbeth, Andersen, Lise L. T., Karlsen, Kamilla K., Pedersen, Monica L., Klemmensen, Åse, Vestgaard, Marianne, Thisted, Dorthe, Tatla, Manrinder K., Andersen, Line S., Brülle, Anne‐Line, Gulbech, Arense, Andersson, Charlotte B., Farlie, Richard, Hansen, Lea, Hvidman, Lone, Sørensen, Anne N., Rathcke, Sidsel L., Rubin, Katrine H., Petersen, Lone K., Jørgensen, Jan S., Stokholm, Lonny, Bliddal, Mette
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Reykjavik John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.11.2021
John Wiley and Sons Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Introduction Assessing the risk factors for and consequences of infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) during pregnancy is essential to guide clinical care. Previous studies on SARS‐CoV‐2 infection in pregnancy have been among hospitalized patients, which may have exaggerated risk estimates of severe outcomes because all cases of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection in the pregnant population were not included. The objectives of this study were to identify risk factors for and outcomes after SARS‐CoV‐2 infection in pregnancy independent of severity of infection in a universally tested population, and to identify risk factors for and outcomes after severe infection requiring hospital admission. Material and methods This was a prospective population‐based cohort study in Denmark using data from the Danish National Patient Register and Danish Microbiology Database and prospectively registered data from medical records. We included all pregnancies between March 1 and October 31, 2020 and compared women with a positive SARS‐CoV‐2 test during pregnancy to non‐infected pregnant women. Cases of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection in pregnancy were both identified prospectively and through register linkage to ensure that all cases were identified and that cases were pregnant during infection. Main outcome measures were pregnancy, delivery, maternal, and neonatal outcomes. Severe infection was defined as hospital admission due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) symptoms. Results Among 82 682 pregnancies, 418 women had SARS‐CoV‐2 infection during pregnancy, corresponding to an incidence of 5.1 per 1000 pregnancies, 23 (5.5%) of which required hospital admission due to COVID‐19. Risk factors for infection were asthma (odds ratio [OR] 2.19, 95% CI 1.41–3.41) and being foreign born (OR 2.12, 95% CI 1.70–2.64). Risk factors for hospital admission due to COVID‐19 included obesity (OR 2.74, 95% CI 1.00–7.51), smoking (OR 4.69, 95% CI 1.58–13.90), infection after gestational age (GA) 22 weeks (GA 22–27 weeks: OR 3.77, 95% CI 1.16–12.29; GA 28–36 weeks: OR 4.76, 95% CI 1.60–14.12), and having asthma (OR 4.53, 95% CI 1.39–14.79). We found no difference in any obstetrical or neonatal outcomes. Conclusions Only 1 in 20 women with SARS‐CoV‐2 infection during pregnancy required admission to hospital due to COVID‐19. Risk factors for admission comprised obesity, smoking, asthma, and infection after GA 22 weeks. Severe adverse outcomes of SARS‐CoV‐2 infection in pregnancy were rare.
Bibliography:Funding information
This study was supported by grants from the Danish Ministry of Higher Education and Science (Reg. no. 0237‐00007B), The Region of Southern Denmark and Region Zealand's shared fund for joint health research projects (Reg. no. A767), and The Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NFOG).
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0001-6349
1600-0412
DOI:10.1111/aogs.14252