Clonality analysis of defined cell populations in paraffin-embedded tissue sections by RT-PCR amplification of X-linked G6PD gene

This paper establishes a method of clonality analysis using the reverse transcription‐polymerase chain reaction (RT‐PCR) to amplify X‐linked G6PD transcripts on defined cell populations microdissected from archival, paraffin‐embedded tissue sections. Four known monoclonal low‐grade B‐cell lymphomas...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Journal of pathology Vol. 191; no. 3; pp. 313 - 317
Main Authors Peng, Huaizheng, R. Lakhani, Sunil, Lee, Chungyin, Zheng, Qiang, K. Chaggar, Ranbir, A. Wright, Nicholas, Pan, Langxing, G. Isaacson, Peter
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Chichester, UK John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 01.07.2000
Wiley
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This paper establishes a method of clonality analysis using the reverse transcription‐polymerase chain reaction (RT‐PCR) to amplify X‐linked G6PD transcripts on defined cell populations microdissected from archival, paraffin‐embedded tissue sections. Four known monoclonal low‐grade B‐cell lymphomas from females who were heterozygous (informative) at the 1131 exonic polymorphic locus of the G6PD gene were used to validate the method. Lymphoma and reactive lesions in each case were separated by microdissection. In order to preserve the intact RNA species in the lesion, sections were digested on the slides before microdissection. A one‐step RT‐PCR was performed with a single pair of primers, one of which contained a mismatched base adjacent to the polymorphic site, to generate a PvuI cutting site. Successful amplification and allele identification by PvuI digestion were achieved from all RNA samples studied. Three of four samples from non‐neoplastic reactive lesions showed two bands with equal intensity, representing transcription of the two alleles of the G6PD gene, while the corresponding tumour samples demonstrated a biased intensity in one allele, indicating monoclonality. To assess the method further, the clonal nature of in situ and invasive breast cancers was examined, along with adjacent normal breast tissue and hyperplastic lesions from three informative females from our archives. Apart from the clusters of normal terminal duct‐lobular units, all lesions were monoclonal. This result is in agreement with data derived from other X‐linked gene studies and loss of heterozygosity (LOH) analyses of pre‐invasive breast disease. The results suggest that the clonality analysis method presented here is simple and reliable, and is therefore potentially applicable in a wide range of pathological conditions. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-GGB5PFLL-T
Special Trustees of the Middlesex Hospital and UCL - No. TGINVDEP 97_1
istex:ABA81123064782169EEF02D0BA505FA6A7C2B913
Leukaemia Research Fund (UK) - No. 9445
ArticleID:PATH621
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0022-3417
1096-9896
DOI:10.1002/1096-9896(2000)9999:9999<::AID-PATH621>3.0.CO;2-3