Software ecosystems – A systematic literature review

► We conducted a systematic literature review on the field of software ecosystems. ► We concluded that there little consensus on what constitutes a software ecosystem. ► Categorized the literature according to the reported result and concluded that there is few analytical models on the field of soft...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Journal of systems and software Vol. 86; no. 5; pp. 1294 - 1306
Main Authors Manikas, Konstantinos, Hansen, Klaus Marius
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Elsevier Inc 01.05.2013
Elsevier Sequoia S.A
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:► We conducted a systematic literature review on the field of software ecosystems. ► We concluded that there little consensus on what constitutes a software ecosystem. ► Categorized the literature according to the reported result and concluded that there is few analytical models on the field of software ecosystems. ► Recognized that there is little research done in the context of real-world software ecosystems. A software ecosystem is the interaction of a set of actors on top of a common technological platform that results in a number of software solutions or services. Arguably, software ecosystems are gaining importance with the advent of, e.g., the Google Android, Apache, and Salesforce.com ecosystems. However, there exists no systematic overview of the research done on software ecosystems from a software engineering perspective. We performed a systematic literature review of software ecosystem research, analyzing 90 papers on the subject taken from a gross collection of 420. Our main conclusions are that while research on software ecosystems is increasing (a) there is little consensus on what constitutes a software ecosystem, (b) few analytical models of software ecosystems exist, and (c) little research is done in the context of real-world ecosystems. This work provides an overview of the field, while identifying areas for future research.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Literature Review-2
ObjectType-Feature-3
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0164-1212
1873-1228
DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2012.12.026