Evaluating the Use of an Electronic Death Registration System for Mortality Surveillance During and After Hurricane Sandy: New York City, 2012

We evaluated the use of New York City's (NYC's) electronic death registration system (EDRS) to conduct mortality surveillance during and after Hurricane Sandy. We used Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines for surveillance system evaluation to gather evidence on usefulness,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAmerican journal of public health (1971) Vol. 105; no. 11; pp. e55 - e62
Main Authors Howland, Renata E, Li, Wenhui, Madsen, Ann M, Wong, Howard, Das, Tara, Betancourt, Flor M, Nicaj, Leze, Stayton, Catherine, Matte, Thomas, Begier, Elizabeth M
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States American Public Health Association 01.11.2015
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:We evaluated the use of New York City's (NYC's) electronic death registration system (EDRS) to conduct mortality surveillance during and after Hurricane Sandy. We used Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines for surveillance system evaluation to gather evidence on usefulness, flexibility, stability, timeliness, and quality. We assessed system components, interviewed NYC Health Department staff, and analyzed 2010 to 2012 death records. Despite widespread disruptions, NYC's EDRS was stable and collected timely mortality data that were adapted to provide storm surveillance with minimal additional resources. Direct-injury fatalities and trends in excess all-cause mortality were rapidly identified, providing useful information for response; however, the time and burden of establishing reports, adapting the system, and identifying indirect deaths limited surveillance. The NYC Health Department successfully adapted its EDRS for near real-time disaster-related mortality surveillance. Retrospective assessment of deaths, advanced methods for case identification and analysis, standardized reports, and system enhancements will further improve surveillance. Local, state, and federal partners would benefit from partnering with vital records to develop EDRSs for surveillance and to promote ongoing evaluation.
Bibliography:Peer Reviewed
R. E. Howland led the data analysis and drafted the article. R. E. Howland, H. Wong, and E. M. Begier contributed to the research design. W. Li contributed to data preparation and analysis. W. Li, A. M. Madsen, L. Nicaj, C. Stayton, T. Matte, and E. M. Begier contributed to the interpretation of the results. H. Wong contributed to data extraction. T. Das and F. M. Betancourt contributed to data collection, data interpretation, and description of the system. All authors contributed to the revision of the article and approved the final version.
Contributors
ISSN:0090-0036
1541-0048
DOI:10.2105/AJPH.2015.302784